Seems like FUD to me. Consider that 11,000 satellite-sized objects are spread over the surface of the earth-- given an entire lifetime to search, how many do you think you could find? It helps a little to imagine it as people instead of objects. Imagine there are only 11,000 people on earth instead of 7 billion-- just the population of one small town, spread over all the oceans and all the continents. Do you think yo…
SpaceX's Starlink Satellite Program Could Start a Space Junk Disaster
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: SpaceX's Starlink Satellite Program Could Start a Space Junk Disaster
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire premise of the article is daft and ignorant of basic orbital mechanics. The Starlink satellites will communicate with each other directly via laser. They can only do that by knowing very precisely where they and the other satellite are, so the whole constellation will have to be continuously tracked at high precision just to function at all.
That is, if all the satellites are functioning. Those that aren’t do actually end up becoming space junk.
Re: SpaceX's Starlink Satellite Program Could Start a Space Junk Disaster
#23The only problem Witness so much satelite in low orbit si tracking them during their life which us easy for thoses as they require precise tracking for being operational.
Re: SpaceX's Starlink Satellite Program Could Start a Space Junk Disaster
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire premise of the article is daft and ignorant of basic orbital mechanics. The Starlink satellites will communicate with each other directly via laser. They can only do that by knowing very precisely where they and the other satellite are, so the whole constellation will have to be continuously tracked at high precision just to function at all.
That is, if all the satellites are functioning. Those that aren’t do actually end up becoming space junk.