The first thing I notice browsing the homepage is that these "not depressing news" are often feel-good stories that can be uplifting but also aren't very intellectually stimulating, e.g.: >Thanks to ‘Super Mom’ Saving Her Husband’s Life, He Opens His Eyes in Time to See His Son’s Birth That's super nice to hear but it barely qualifies as "news" as far as I'm concerned. Meanwhile those that seem more interesting are n…
> contemplating the scale of the universe (both in space and in time) is really soothing to me. I contemplate those things and regularly verge on existential crisis. From a news curation perspective, I typically follow a couple of simple rules: timeliness, importance, and proximity. For a site focused on 'good' and 'uplifting' I think I would follow your preferences and focus on new research and development (like can…
This very quickly devolves into pop-sci clickbait. Cancer gets solved roughly 3 times a week, along with Alzheimer's and every other scary sounding disease. And our battery capacity somehow goes up by an order of magnitude a few times a month. And so on.
Journalism is just broken in the internet age. Clickbait is more profitable than reality. Anger inducing clickbait is the most profitable of all.