Earlier quoted context omitted.
>You're creating a class of people with indestructible inherited wealth that never have to work, that only have to collect interest and rent on the backs of everyone else. That wealth is invested in profitable ventures that either create benefits in the system (assuming rational actors) or 2) lose value due to poor choices. Capital is rewarded because the investors are taking opportunity cost risks that advance the s…
I think you have a profound misunderstanding of what someone with billions of dollars in inherited wealth does with their money. It's not investing in "profitable ventures" that "create benefits", it's tied up in businesses they inherited, it's squirreled away in tax havens, it's spent on lavish properties, club memberships, expensive cars, and tuition for their children. If you're lucky a tiny fraction of that trick…
All of that is trickle down to workers for those jobs
> it's tied up in businesses they inherited
That means the sum benefit to humanity is still going!
> Then that money generates enough of a return that their kids can inherit billions in turn and the cycle repeats.
I cant imagine someone who more deserves to direct the money after their death than the one who earned it. I'm sure many parents (not Buffet though) would rather their child have it than the government.
> If you have even half competent people managing your money an estate worth $10B
I'm sure those half competent people are well compensated for their skills. Shame that billionaires are so evil as to provide those jobs...