Live data from Hacker News

Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

bbc.com

181–190 of 238 posts

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#181
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personal allowance (zero tax band) raised to £12,500 from April (in the Budget today). This gives money to richer voters because the higher your earnings, the more tax saved. But corporation tax takes money from rather anonymous entities, which of course affects voters too in the end but in a rather indirect way.

> This gives money to richer voters because the higher your earnings, the more tax saved. a rise of the zero rate equally effects anyone earning above the new zero rate threshold (regardless of how much they are above it [1]) a full time minimum wage employee earning ~£14,000/year gets exactly the same reduction in tax from this specific increase as an engineer on £90,000/year [1]: once you get above £100,000/year yo…

The engineer on £90k got an additional £730 tax cut with the 40% threshold moving from £46,350 to £50,000.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#182

The UK has gotten very frustrated with the slow movement of international lawmaking in this space. With business rate slashes to help struggling retailers (retaliation against Amazon) and mental health funding increases for schools (retaliation against Facebook/Google), I'm quite happy to see something happen at last. I expect other governments to follow suit. From a tech defence angle, I can't see Trump rallying in…

2% OF REVENUE? NOT PROFIT? LOLLL papa trump don't play that, bezo or not.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fairest way is to pay tax where you do business, you know, like you’re supposed to. It’s not really different for tech companies or global companies.

But it's much more complicated than that because the system is not meant to either incentivise or disincentivise insourced vs outsourced functions (and what you seem to be suggesting would create incentives for offshore outsourcing for them, which would be politically unpopular). And corporation tax is a tax on profits, not revenue (VAT already exists and is a tax on revenue and Amazon UK pays a very large amount of…

> Amazon UK pays a very large amount of VAT.

Amazon collects a very large amount of VAT, no? It's the customers who are paying, not Amazon.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#184
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

for some value of "usually" corporation tax: 30% in 2008, 19% in 2018 zero rate band of income tax: £3000 in 1990, £11850 today (the increase is more than double that of inflation)

Personal allowance (zero tax band) raised to £12,500 from April (in the Budget today). This gives money to richer voters because the higher your earnings, the more tax saved. But corporation tax takes money from rather anonymous entities, which of course affects voters too in the end but in a rather indirect way.

You lose your personal allowance half a percentage point for every pound you earn over £100k. People who earn £125k get 0 of the basic rate.

The fun thing is that total marginal income tax between those two numbers is 60% without counting national insurance.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#185
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personal allowance (zero tax band) raised to £12,500 from April (in the Budget today). This gives money to richer voters because the higher your earnings, the more tax saved. But corporation tax takes money from rather anonymous entities, which of course affects voters too in the end but in a rather indirect way.

> This gives money to richer voters because the higher your earnings, the more tax saved. a rise of the zero rate equally effects anyone earning above the new zero rate threshold (regardless of how much they are above it [1]) a full time minimum wage employee earning ~£14,000/year gets exactly the same reduction in tax from this specific increase as an engineer on £90,000/year [1]: once you get above £100,000/year yo…

The Resolution Foundation disagrees: https://twitter.com/resfoundation/status/1056969156741029889

However I agree that anyone earning over £100K won't be affected because of the peculiar system where you lose the personal allowance in steps over this threshold.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#186
post #67

It's nice to see they can plan a road map for tax but for brexit.... It sounds good but something tells me it will end up increasing prices for consumers.

They did have a plan for Brexit but I think it amounted to 1) eat cake 2) still have total access to mainland Europe's cake markets too. On a more serious note a tax plan is easier because the government only has to negotiate with itself while Brexit actually involves outside countries who are disinclined to give the UK a cushy deal.

I know it's different things but at least this has a road map of what is planned and when by.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#187
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get it. On the one hand you say you just wanted to make clear the distinction between the two terms, on the other you claim when facebook and Amazon are avoiding taxes that's the same as when ordinary people try to save for retirement. If you didn't want to be quoted on that you shouldn't have put that comparison in.

I don’t mind being quoted on anything. It’s either legal or it isn’t. For one you can prosecute, the other you can only criticise. It doesn’t matter if it’s a single person or a massive company. Either we have made the solemn decision as a country that it is prohibited with the force of the state punishing you, or we haven’t. It’s a huge difference. Think about it like this. The next time someone is really evading ta…

Look, we disagree on how tax avoidance should be dealt with on a personal and a corporate level and that‘s fine. But you‘re constantly conflating a valid point (which is a proper distinction between the two terms and which I agree with) with your opinion on the matter.

If one were less charitable you could call that a strawman.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#188
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it's much more complicated than that because the system is not meant to either incentivise or disincentivise insourced vs outsourced functions (and what you seem to be suggesting would create incentives for offshore outsourcing for them, which would be politically unpopular). And corporation tax is a tax on profits, not revenue (VAT already exists and is a tax on revenue and Amazon UK pays a very large amount of…

> Amazon UK pays a very large amount of VAT. Amazon collects a very large amount of VAT, no? It's the customers who are paying, not Amazon.

Correct.

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

English is the business language of the world. I highly doubt there's some tech epicenter near Brussels that would rival Silicon Valley (or even New York City, Seattle, or Austin) if only those companies spoke English. And sure being a Unicorn is everything, but it sure as hell isn't nothing. I have no doubt there there is a company in Europe doing something amazing, but Europe doesn't have a culture that continues t…

I remember some tech crunch reporter claiming they'd never heard of a nine figure tech sale in Europe, the same day as a local business in my home city (Nottingham) was sold for over £100 million. It's not that we don't have a tech industry in Europe, it's just that US tech reporters are often insular, ignorant and lazy.

> US tech reporters are often insular, ignorant and lazy.

And then there are the bad ones…

Re: Tech giants face 2% UK digital services tax

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That article seems to be confusing revenue with profit. The $2 billion Amazon made in the UK is revenue; I suspect its profit is actually smaller.

So does the policy. Deliberately. This is 2% off the top . You aren't buying from a UK company when you visit Amazon.co.uk, rather Amazon EU S.a.r.L (based in Luxembourg). This would take back 2% that is coming out of the pockets of UK consumers and being taxed (at a much lower rate) in Luxembourg. The Amazon UK tax liability is barely anything. They put a handful of professional services through their books here, an…

This.

And then you have ethically dubious practices like Starbucks getting a super sweetheart deal in the Netherlands, and then "charging" the UK arm a "licensing fee" for the brand name. Despite being the same bloody company, just to exfiltrate the tax from where it should have been paid, to where they will have to pay less.

Legal? Yes. Ethical? No. Should it be stamped out? Yes. Will that require all countries to act? Sadly, yes.

Post reply on HN