Live data from Hacker News

IBM acquires Red Hat

redhat.com

131–140 of 1001 posts

Re: IBM acquires Red Hat

#132

Hoping they will stick to this: "IBM to maintain Red Hat’s open source innovation legacy, scaling its vast technology portfolio and empowering its widespread developer community Red Hat to operate as a distinct unit within IBM’s Hybrid Cloud team" I guess this was an important part of the deal, otherwise it wouldn't make much sense.

“Y buys X for it to operate distinctly within Y.” usually doesn’t mean much. It doesn’t imply independence.

Re: IBM acquires Red Hat

#133
This reminds me of an article[1] I wrote predicting shifting trends in Open Source development, in particular of core infrastructure tools.

There is a huge ripe opportunity for a new company/non-profit to step in and set precedence on the future of developer tools. People don't "Dream Big" anymore, and having the biggest OSS companies absorbed by the most proprietary of companies is a perfect example of hope being lost. I hope we can revert this trend, who wants to help?

1. https://hackernoon.com/the-implications-of-rethinkdb-and-par...

Re: IBM acquires Red Hat

#135
post #86
post #59

IBM has been very open source friendly over the last 20 years, more so as of recently.

Show me a single core product IBM have open sourced.

I'm sure that you can draw a line where it does not count as "core product", but Eclipse has to count as something.

Re: IBM acquires Red Hat

#137

This affects on so many open source projects in addition to RHEL. ANSIBLE, Ceph, OpenShift, Linux kernel, JBoss as well as everything Red Hat acquired from CoreOS.

I hope CoreOS succeeds regardless. It has built a very nice ecosystem around it.

Re: IBM acquires Red Hat

#140
Time for an increased focus on productivity and deadlines and shareholder return until all talent leaves from burn out.

Good news for any tech company looking for talent in the next few years.

Post reply on HN