Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#2The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#3Other than removing the tweet, which they didn't do, what could they have done? The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
Twitter is a communications service, not the police.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#4Other than removing the tweet, which they didn't do, what could they have done? The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#5I think it's easy to make Twitter the bad guy, censor and you get called out for it, allow free speech and they become responsible for people's actions.
The polarity increase between "us" and "them" and especially the political animosity between parties is the catalyst for this kind of radicalism. It no longer feels like American first, politics second.
Are we able to detect sarcasm using artificial intelligence yet? Because until that's possible, the credibility of a threat is going to be the job of law enforcement and not Twitter.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#6Other than removing the tweet, which they didn't do, what could they have done? The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
This. Twitter is a communications service, not the police.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#7I don't understand the media. I think it's easy to make Twitter the bad guy, censor and you get called out for it, allow free speech and they become responsible for people's actions. The polarity increase between "us" and "them" and especially the political animosity between parties is the catalyst for this kind of radicalism. It no longer feels like American first, politics second. Are we able to detect sarcasm usin…
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#8Other than removing the tweet, which they didn't do, what could they have done? The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
This. Twitter is a communications service, not the police.
You're right, but it's easy to see how they've blurred the line by taking action to ban some high profile individuals from their platform.
Re: Twitter didn't act after bomb suspect made threats on its platform
#10Other than removing the tweet, which they didn't do, what could they have done? The strain it would out on Twitter and law enforcement investigating every single tweet that contains violence would be too much.
This. Twitter is a communications service, not the police.
The police are an organization meant to "serve & protect."