Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#2Journalists outright lying... This one is shocking, I've never seen it before...
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#3Journalists outright lying... This one is shocking, I've never seen it before...
The WSJ article did not claim that Tesla received a subpoena.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#4There's no refuting of anything in the article. They actually CONFIRM that they've gotten document requests from DOJ, just voluntarily provided rather than after a subpoena. Watch your bias.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#5There's no refuting of anything in the article. They actually CONFIRM that they've gotten document requests from DOJ, just voluntarily provided rather than after a subpoena. Watch your bias.
From 2015 till now, and this your 3rd comment ever...
Seems like there is a interesting story hidden somewhere here. Care to share?
Or is this just one of many alts?
EDIT: Not trying to start anything, not sure why this line of questioning is freaking everybody out. I am just generally curious how a account is this old and what drives somebody to comment so infrequently. Like really, this is the one topic in 3 years somebody commented on - it might be interesting to hear why.
You look at other accounts and they comment on just about anything ever. So I am just wondering what about this topic has driven somebody to comment.
Also, there is no way to send a PM to anybody so...
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#6Really opens your eyes to how careful a company(with shares) must be with anything said, if projections call for criminal probe.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#7There's no refuting of anything in the article. They actually CONFIRM that they've gotten document requests from DOJ, just voluntarily provided rather than after a subpoena. Watch your bias.
There's a big difference between handing over documents voluntarily to a government request and being forced to by subpoena though.
I'm curious on the exact wording the original article had.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#8There's no refuting of anything in the article. They actually CONFIRM that they've gotten document requests from DOJ, just voluntarily provided rather than after a subpoena. Watch your bias.
There's a big difference between handing over documents voluntarily to a government request and being forced to by subpoena though. I'm curious on the exact wording the original article had.
the original article said ex-employees had received subpoena, not tesla.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#9The WSJ article is being discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18311492.
Re: Tesla says it has not received subpoena on Model 3 production
#10Journalists outright lying... This one is shocking, I've never seen it before...
You're right, it is unusual. Journalists being falsely accused of lying, on the other hand, is depressingly common.