Live data from Hacker News

If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

neh.gov

21–30 of 75 posts

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#21
post #10

Why, the phone book, of course. Usually the yellow pages, if you were in a reasonably sized metropolis. Nobody used a dictionary; I can’t imagine where this misinformation came from. The advantage of using a phone book was that a new one was delivered, completely for free, every year, so you just had to hang on to an old one if you were particularly fastidious, and otherwise just used the current one. And they were s…

We used the dictionary. It was three inches thick, while the phone book was less than half an inch.

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#22
I recently tackled a book that was rather above my French reading level. It only took about half an hour spent fumbling with my Larousse before I plunked down $6 on their iOS app so that I could get back to reading my book. That weekend, my trusty old dictionary and I paid a visit to the used bookstore.

It's hard for me to imagine an information technology that's been more thoroughly superseded than the print dictionary. Electronic media make it faster to look words up in the first place, sure. But I also get audible pronunciations, and, if a definition includes another word I don't know, I can just tap on it to navigate to its definition. A print encyclopedia, you can at least sit down with a volume and just read it, and it's an experience that's sometimes more fun than surfing Wikipedia, by virtue of feeling a bit more random and serendipitous. But using a dictionary is always vaguely unpleasant; all you want to do is accomplish a specific task and then get back to your business.

The author is right. They really do derive most their value these days from being, in effect, large blocks of wood.

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where I live (Denmark), nobody makes any phonebooks anymore. I believe the last time I used one was in 2003.

I've not seen a phone book since moving to Norway, and just realized it after reading your comment. In the states, I'd get at least one every year - sometimes two - and it didn't matter if I wanted one or not. I honestly think they print them because businesses pay to be in them.

>I honestly think they print them because businesses pay to be in them

Well, sure. That's what the yellow pages basically are--advertising for local businesses. (There may be some level of listing that's free. I don't know.) As other have noted, my local yellow pages is pretty small and thin these days though with the caveat that I don't live in a city. I suspect that a listing/ad is no longer quite the requirement for local businesses that it once was.

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#24
post #10

Why, the phone book, of course. Usually the yellow pages, if you were in a reasonably sized metropolis. Nobody used a dictionary; I can’t imagine where this misinformation came from. The advantage of using a phone book was that a new one was delivered, completely for free, every year, so you just had to hang on to an old one if you were particularly fastidious, and otherwise just used the current one. And they were s…

We used the dictionary. It was three inches thick, while the phone book was less than half an inch.

[deleted]

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#25
post #10

Why, the phone book, of course. Usually the yellow pages, if you were in a reasonably sized metropolis. Nobody used a dictionary; I can’t imagine where this misinformation came from. The advantage of using a phone book was that a new one was delivered, completely for free, every year, so you just had to hang on to an old one if you were particularly fastidious, and otherwise just used the current one. And they were s…

We definitely used the phonebook in Miami. Between the white pages and mulitple yellow pages there was enough stack height for several kids. And my mom would've killed us if we sat on her books.

Speaking of road maps, my first real road trip, early 90s, I used a AAA TripTik. I’m glad not to need that anymore, but there’s still a place in the world for paper maps.

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#26
This whole article is offensive to my personal sensibilities. I suspect this is because (not that I'm as fancy as the author) I have at least a smidgen or shadow of taste, so not being able to ostentatiously display how dignified and fancy I am with a useless tome I would never reference isn't a terrifying prospect. I'll just have to develop other empty, meaningless ways to impress people, like having my think piece inexplicably hosted at neh.gov.

Re: If Printed Dictionaries Are History, What'll Children Sit on to Reach the Table?

#30
post #10

Why, the phone book, of course. Usually the yellow pages, if you were in a reasonably sized metropolis. Nobody used a dictionary; I can’t imagine where this misinformation came from. The advantage of using a phone book was that a new one was delivered, completely for free, every year, so you just had to hang on to an old one if you were particularly fastidious, and otherwise just used the current one. And they were s…

Still not sure if the hours I spent as a kid scrolling down the names in the phone book and deciphering the foreign-sounding ones were well spent.
Post reply on HN