Live data from Hacker News

Calculus Made Easy (1910)

calculusmadeeasy.org

31–40 of 76 posts

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#31
post #5

Sorry for the interruption ; here is a thread (with 188 comments) about this book from a year back: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14161876

Here is a link from the comments that includes a high-quality PDF of the text instead of page scans: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf?session_i...

If you click through the links, the text has been reset here, only the front page is a complete scan.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#32
>Being myself a remarkably stupid fellow, I have had to unteach myself the difficulties, and now beg to present to my fellow fools the parts that are not hard. Master these thoroughly, and the rest will follow. What one fool can do, another can

This is the revolution that software development is long overdue for.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#33
One thing that seems to be missing (and wasn't given a lot of attention when I was in school) was the notion that the reals are continuous. Calculus made a lot more sense to me once I internalized how that one simple idea basically serves as the rug that really ties the room together.

I've often thought that an interesting treatment would start with differences and sums of integers as approximations, demonstrate their errors and then introduce reals and limits as a tool for making better theoretical models using the infinite "zoom button" continuity property of the reals.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#34

Although the calculus concepts from 1910 may still be relevant, quotes like these make the book outputting -- "The preliminary terror, which chokes off most fifth-form boys from even attempting to learn how to calculate..." Ugh!

"may still be relevant" -> they're still relevant and you should probably known or inform yourself on this sort of thing before opining.

Besides that, there is an awful lot of literature that you must be unable of reading if you find any reference to historical norms of past times to be offputting, which is incredibly dangerous. What do you think would have happened to human progress if muslim or renaissance christian scholars felt like you about the texts from classical antiquity that they learnt so much from?

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#35
post #24

From the book: >I To deliver you from the Preliminary Terrors >The preliminary terror [..] can be abolished once for all by simply stating what is the meaning–in common-sense terms–of the two principal symbols: (1) d, which merely means “a little bit of.” Thus dx means a little bit of x; or du means a little bit of u. (2) ∫, which is merely a long S, and may be called (if you like) “the sum of.” As someone who taught…

Indeed. They never explained this at school and we were just memorizing and applying formulae having no idea of the meaning. So many years have passed an I've only realized what does the d actually mean some weeks ago and now I see this book explaining it this easy at the very beginning written in 1910!

Hey, there's more!

First, why "d"? Well, "d" is for "difference". As in: as x changes from x_1 to x_2, the difference (x_2 - x_1) -- when it's very small.

But wait, there's more!

The commonly used symbols for finite difference like that is the Greek letter Delta: Δ

For a list of values x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4,.. we write Δx_i = (x_i - x_{i-1}). That is, Δx_i is the i'th change. (Side note: an airline had a marketing slogan Change is Delta, which some nerd must have been immensely proud of).

Ok, bear with me for a bit more!

The symbol we use for finite sums is Σ: we write Σy_i = y_1 + y_2 + ... + y_n

Why Σ? That will have to wait a little.

Sums and differences cancel out:

ΣΔy_i = (y_1 - y_0) + (y_2 - y_1) + (y_3 - y_2) + ... + (y_n - y_{n-1}) = y_n - y_0

That is, summing up small succesive changes gives you total change. Simple?

Now apply this to the situation where the small changes in the quantity you are looking at are proportional to changes in another:

Δy_i = Δx_i * f(x_i)

Say, y is position, x is time; then f(x_i) is the speed at time x_i: as time increases a little, so does your position; the ratio of the changes is the speed. Δy_i is how much you moved from time x_{i-1} to time x_i, which is proportional to change in time Δx_i.

Note that f(x_i) = Δy_i/Δx_i here (speed = change in position div. by change in time).

Now write:

y_n - y_0 = ΣΔy_i = Σf(x_i)Δx_i

Again, just summing up small changes to get the net chnage.

NOW, what you've been waiting for!

Imagine you took infinitely many measurements. The changes become infinitely small, and the sum becomes of infinitely many things.

We need new notation for this.

But let's keep it similar. Instead of using Greek letters, let's use the same letters... in Latin.

Δx becomes dx

ΣΔy becomes S dy

And, with some sloppy handwriting of the letter S, the net change equation becomes:

y_final - y_initial = ∫ f(x)dx

where

f(x) = dy/dx.

You now see that Σ and the sloppy S -- ∫ -- stand for Sum.

And that, my friend, is pretty much all there is to Calculus and its symbols, fundamentally[1].

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calcu...

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#36

Hi. I am author of this website. I hope you like it. I made it public today. It was my favorite math textbook and I think it still can help a lot of people :-)

I have read through the first few chapters now and it is brilliant. The author uses excellent examples without ceremony that makes the topic far more approachable than I found it in school.

Thanks for making this resource available and giving it some exposure.

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#38

> Obviously 1 minute is a very small quantity of time compared with a whole week. Indeed, our forefathers considered it small as compared with an hour, and called it “one minùte,” meaning a minute fraction–namely one sixtieth–of an hour. When they came to require still smaller subdivisions of time, they divided each minute into 60 still smaller parts, which, in Queen Elizabeth's days, they called “second minùtes” (i.…

For more about this, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_(angle)#Subdivisions

Re: Calculus Made Easy (1910)

#39

Hi. I am author of this website. I hope you like it. I made it public today. It was my favorite math textbook and I think it still can help a lot of people :-)

Thank you for taking the time to do this. It's one of my favorite math books, and it's always been hard to read as scanned PDFs.
Post reply on HN