Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
smithsonianmag.com
Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
1–10 of 163 posts
Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#2Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#3I grew up in a household that had passed that 350 book mark, and beyond all of the actual meaningful improvements it has made to my life, it also meant that reading comprehension on standardized testing was laughably easy. So teach your kids to love books, and enjoy reading. It doesn't have to be high-brow intellectually challenging shit, just make sure that they associate books with fun.
Due to school and forced reading assingments, reading gets associated too often with work or boring assignments.
Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#4Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#5How would growing up in a household with only ebooks, or a household with only physical books make a difference? (Assuming an equal number of both)
Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#6Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#7Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#8Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#9I would assume on average that the more books your family could afford, the more money they have.
Re: Large home libraries may have a long-term impact on proficiency: study
#10It did not say “books in the home make you smarter.” It was arguing “books are a reasonable cross-cultural proxy for orientation towards scholasticism in the home.”
This summary, to my reading of the actual article, completely confuses cause and effect.