I was curious so I checked out their Github page. I found this example:
classNames('foo', 'bar'); // => 'foo bar'
classNames('foo', { bar: true }); // => 'foo bar'
classNames({ 'foo-bar': true }); // => 'foo-bar'
classNames({ 'foo-bar': false }); // => ''
classNames({ foo: true }, { bar: true }); // => 'foo bar'
classNames({ foo: true, bar: true }); // => 'foo bar'
...
var btnClass = classNames({
btn: true,
'btn-pressed': this.state.isPressed,
'btn-over': !this.state.isPressed && this.state.isHovered
});
Look like the button example is a good enough convention for me, I don't need any of the other conventions. Can anyone tell me why this is not sufficient?:
const classNames = (pojo, c=[]) => {
for (let k in pojo) if (pojo[k]) c.push(k);
return !!c.length && c.join(" ");
}
Do I need array-flattening support, multiple argument support? The size of this library probably comes from it supporting a handful of different coding styles. I would say the size (50 lines) is too large, if anything. Dependency worthy? I'm not convinced. I am very much so against requiring trivial utility functions from other people. Roll your own if it's trivial! It's better than depending on something over the network.