It's bit funny to see all these outpouring of emotions. Just last month we been talking about him and some folks pointed out how he has spent a tiny fraction of accidental lottery in to actual good such as Allen Institute and Semantic Scholar. A REALLY tiny fraction of his immense wealth. Many people think he has spent an order of magnitude more on organizing private rock concerts in desert, building yacht with his p…
Speaking as someone who works in a nonprofit trying to get high end research done, funding is complicated--the equation is absolutely not More Money == More Progress. There are very tricky trade offs, perverse incentives, and huge talent bottlenecks, among other challenges. A lot of places I work closely around would turn down additional funding if it was offered, given other bottlenecks, the counterfactual use of that money, and the perverse incentives.
I didn't know Paul Allen at all, but if he's like other billionaires, he had teams of really smart people actively figuring out the actually correct amount of money to put in the actually correct places, to actually make a difference.
They might have been wrong in their analysis, but I'm confident that in no world did Paul ever say to himself, "Well, there is this slam dunk cause I could give to that would help a lot of people and more science forward, but instead I'll have a yacht with a music studio."