Live data from Hacker News

Study shows massive insect loss

washingtonpost.com

51–60 of 213 posts

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a horrible way to end a post. Try - always be mindful and intentional with your actions and the actions of those around you. Work hard towards building a better world.

I am. Are you?

Kill yourself tonight if you're so keen on dying early. Do us all a favour.

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#52

It probably won't save the world, but we developers sure could do more to save energy and not requiring ridiculous hardware resources for what seems like merely gradual improvements over the 90s, with all the chemicals for processing and in batteries, and with all the waste. By this time, we could've achieved long-lived solar-powered mobiles with B/W LCDs. I remember text processing software being pitched as paper-sa…

You mean like Proof of Work mining?

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#53

Years ago, my family used to drive to our grandparents' village in hot, summer Friday nights. The windshield ended so pestered with dead bugs that the first task on Saturday morning was to drive the car to the river to clean it. I remember it vividly because it was so fun to wash the car with the cold river water. Last August I went stargazing with my wife. We chose a secluded area because it was far away from light…

It's such a minor thing when it comes to our day to day but becomes truly terrifying when you put it all together and look at the big picture. I've noticed the same thing about wild-life in general whenever I visit my favorite places from childhood - whether it's the reefs around Australia, the tide pools in Baja, or the inland empire desert I grew up in. Looking at actual research just makes it worse: a third of mic…

> And so, slowly, we boil.

Climate changing power, without the wisdom to wield it, is as plausible a Great Filter as anything.

Hard to develop a space program when you're spending all your production fighting over scarce resources, plugging leaks, and attempting to feed a planet with decreasing yields.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#54
post #22
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Prefixes, not cognates.

One of the examples that coldnose offers has a suffix appended to it, so I think you're incorrect, too. Maybe affixes? By the way, yours is an example of Muphry's law. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law And because I'm correcting your incorrect correction, I have a feeling that I've gotten something wrong, too.

Which one is a suffix? super- hyper- ultra- mega- are all prefixes

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#56
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

So your GP's anecdata is cool but your parent's anecdata is not. :)

Parent's comment is "Actually X can't be happening because Y happened to me". GP's comment is "Z is happening, which might explain why I've noticed W". Parent's comment is textbook cherry-picking, GP's is closer to a regular anecdote.

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#57
post #55
post #18

I'd be more inclined to blame neonicotinoid pesticides than change in temperature, but seems plausible I guess.

Why would you be more inclined to blame neonicotinoid pesticides?

Presumably because their entire purpose is to kill insects?

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#58
post #52

It probably won't save the world, but we developers sure could do more to save energy and not requiring ridiculous hardware resources for what seems like merely gradual improvements over the 90s, with all the chemicals for processing and in batteries, and with all the waste. By this time, we could've achieved long-lived solar-powered mobiles with B/W LCDs. I remember text processing software being pitched as paper-sa…

You mean like Proof of Work mining?

I a more generalist sense just things like using Electron vs native toolkits matter. The desktop Discord app is going to use substantially more power to run day to day than if it were a native code app that just used something like C++, and across millions of gamers for hours a night every night those resource requirements and power demands add up.

It isn't always just "average hardware is faster so use more inefficient frameworks to lower time to market". Using those shortcuts to ship makes sense, but it should then be a long term goal to reel in those expensive abstractions once you can start counting the amount of power your software is using on a regular basis by whole power plants required to keep your code running on a daily basis.

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#59
post #25

Years ago, my family used to drive to our grandparents' village in hot, summer Friday nights. The windshield ended so pestered with dead bugs that the first task on Saturday morning was to drive the car to the river to clean it. I remember it vividly because it was so fun to wash the car with the cold river water. Last August I went stargazing with my wife. We chose a secluded area because it was far away from light…

I have similar memories from my childhood in the 80's. We lived in Savannah and would make the trek to North Georgia several times a year to visit my mom's family. I can remember the headlights illuminating a sea of bugs like a light snow and the bigger ones popping loudly on the windshield from time to time. Having a full reservoir of wiper fluid was crucial and my dad would let me scrub the windshield whenever we s…

[deleted]

Re: Study shows massive insect loss

#60
My wife and I leave large portions of our lawn untended. We seed ours with flowering native plants and herbs. We had fireflies and butterflies and bees galore this year— noticeably more than any of our neighbors. It’s not much, but it’s something.
Post reply on HN