Live data from Hacker News

The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

theguardian.com

11–20 of 38 posts

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#11
The article is a pretty weak summary of events.

However, the across-the-board blanket denials seem suspect. Of course you'd deny that you gave a 3 letter agency access to your hardware.

Someone needs to procure one of these tainted boards soon though.

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#12
post #10
post #2

This article is a summary of the current state of affairs; There is no new information, and does not answer the question in the headline. Bloomberg says a spy chip was discovered and Apple and Amazon worked with the government to investigate. Apple and Amazon both deny the story is correct.

> There is no new information, It links to the Cambridge university security team blog and they say Bloomberg's claim passes the sniff test. https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2018/10/05/making-sense-...

Which has been discussed before https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18148749

So whether that's new information or not depends on how much time you waste on HN ;)

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#13
Given the scarce technical details provided by Bloomberg and demonstrated Bloomberg reporter’s lack of understanding on how hardware works, it’s entirely possible someone fooled Bloomberg. Bloomberg said it has 17 sources, but perhaps one source intentionally gave a false story, another described an unrelated attack, and the third merely commented on the technical possibility of a chip hack instead of its existence. Without much technical expertise, the Bloomberg reporter could not determine which of the sources are credible and relevant, but he surely knew which buzzwords are good for a story. So he created a sensational narrative that could attract as much attention as possible, based on selected information that helps the narrative.

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#15
Is there a problem with how much power some journalists have to move markets?

If this story turns out to be wrong, and it also wasn't fraud, it feels wildly unfair for a company to have half evaporated overnight.

Dangerous topic so I'll say that I'm not suggesting limits on journalism or freedom of speech.

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#16
post #10
post #2

This article is a summary of the current state of affairs; There is no new information, and does not answer the question in the headline. Bloomberg says a spy chip was discovered and Apple and Amazon worked with the government to investigate. Apple and Amazon both deny the story is correct.

> There is no new information, It links to the Cambridge university security team blog and they say Bloomberg's claim passes the sniff test. https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2018/10/05/making-sense-...

Im not familiar with this Cambridge researcher, but they seem very far off the mark and I do not think the original article passes the smell test.

Let's make multiple very serious and not reasonable assumptions and jump to the end: a compromised bmc on the network.

It is still non-trivial to get anything accomplished. Either you pass traffic through the likely sinkholed DNS (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDNS) or make hard coded calls likely to be flagged by ips/ids. Even if you don't get caught immediately, the number of firewalls with access rules to wan to lan traffic back to your ilo/idrac has got to be effectively 0. Even if the access rules are in place, I'd bet Nat isn't - even reverse ssh tunnels require Nat. There are file integrity solutions to check for OS compromises ( https://www.tripwire.com/solutions/file-integrity-and-change...)

The idea that these were shipped randomly globally to Enterprise environments and no one ever figured it out is basically impossible. Maybe there is some grey area and the CTOs and CISOs just never got told what the Frontline admins didn't think was a big deal.

Something else is going on. Maybe this is FUD with China in the title to fuel some political economic maneuvering. Maybe everything about the attack is real except Russia did it to hurt China.

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#17

Who knows? Bloomberg might have just ripped the image of thier chip from the mouser catalog and called it a day.. https://www.mouser.com/new/tdk/tdk-rf-components/

AFAIK the images used in the Bloomberg article were illustrations / stock images

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#18
post #11

The article is a pretty weak summary of events. However, the across-the-board blanket denials seem suspect. Of course you'd deny that you gave a 3 letter agency access to your hardware. Someone needs to procure one of these tainted boards soon though.

What would it take for you to believe the denials?

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#19

Who knows? Bloomberg might have just ripped the image of thier chip from the mouser catalog and called it a day.. https://www.mouser.com/new/tdk/tdk-rf-components/

AFAIK the images used in the Bloomberg article were illustrations / stock images

I wish there was a ban on using stock imagery in news reporting. They should either put a real photo, or no photo at all. Putting stock photos almost always creates confusion.

Re: The tech giants, the US and the Chinese spy chips that never were; or were they?

#20
I wouldn't be surprised if this was some sort of PR campaign similar to Iraq's WMDs. It does make sense that Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction and could use them against civil populations; likewise, it does make sense that China could access the supply chain, and could use it to access government and corporate networks. The end goal is to change public perception and get support on the idea that the US should focus its efforts on that country (instead of the Mueller investigation or Russia for example). In Iraq's WMDs, the symbol was Colin Powell's vial of Anthrax, here it's a tiny chip that promises to unlock all servers. It's a symbol strong enough that goes well on TV or media.

True or not, what matters is that the seeds of distrust has been sowed. It's billions of $ lost for Supermicro shareholders, and potentially distrust of China.

Post reply on HN