Live data from Hacker News

Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

cliqz.com

41–50 of 140 posts

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#41
post #20

Plus it knocked a lot of potential competitors off the internet. I know multiple young startups and entrepreneurs in Europe that killed their projects/ideas because the additional burden of coping with GDPR was too much for them.

Why would they give up specifically because of GDPR? It just makes no sense, there's thousands of regulations already on all the parts of the day-to-day life of running a business, I wonder how they planned to manage the rest of them.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#42
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? Because I haven’t heard of any, and I live and work here. Any sources?

They are young single founders in the idea or mvc stage. So nobody that is mentioned by any sources.

I’m a little surprised then, because the only problem I see for basic GDPR compliance for a single founder is if their business model is based on monetising their users’ data. Which is going to be a problem, regardless of the size of the organisation.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#43
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's also fine - was their content worth your privacy? If they can't be GDPR compliant we don't want them.

> was their content worth your privacy? What privacy was I losing?

First one that comes to my mind: their advertisers knowing you're on those sites, which page you read, when, for how long, etc. This is mitigated by running an Adblocker and a selective Javascript disabling extension like uMatrix or NoScript, but it would be much better if those sites would let their readers decide if they want to be tracked or not.

Anyway, I'm also blocked on those sites but the same news on LA Times and Fox appear on countless other sites. I'm not losing anything, they're not wasting power and bandwidth for a freeloader. Win/win.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#44
The biggest beneficiaries of the GDPR are individual citizens.

But that doesn't even enter into the tech industry zeitgeist, where commentators are enthralled by the bloodsport between corporate champions and the lives lived by actual humans are incidental and inconsequential.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#45
post #38

Offtopic: am I the only one to see the optical illusion of the 0% line bendin upwards to the left in the "change in the number of trackers per page, by category, EU vs US"? [1] [1] deep link: https://static.cliqz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/trackers...

No, you're not.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#46

If I read that graph correctly the number of trackers per page has gone UP 20% since April in some categories for US visitors.

But it went down in the EU, so I guess they need to make more money on tracking and profiling somewhere else now.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#47
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? Because I haven’t heard of any, and I live and work here. Any sources?

They are young single founders in the idea or mvc stage. So nobody that is mentioned by any sources.

It took me 2 hours to get my family member's small web business GDPR compliant...

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#48
post #20

Plus it knocked a lot of potential competitors off the internet. I know multiple young startups and entrepreneurs in Europe that killed their projects/ideas because the additional burden of coping with GDPR was too much for them.

Why would they give up specifically because of GDPR? It just makes no sense, there's thousands of regulations already on all the parts of the day-to-day life of running a business, I wonder how they planned to manage the rest of them.

Seriously. The Data Protection Directive alone already included most of the GDPR.

Re: Study: Google is the biggest beneficiary of the GDPR

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's also fine - was their content worth your privacy? If they can't be GDPR compliant we don't want them.

Maybe you don’t but can you speak for everyone? The poster seemed to think that was undesirable.

We, the people of the EU, have democratically decided that we don't want them.
Post reply on HN