Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Finally a named source, but [...] Indeed, insisting on evidence and reasoned argument is a good thing. > I'm now wondering if someone found an NSA implant and misreported it as Chinese. Sigh... If you don't know you don't know. You can't use uncertainty about the source of someone else's hyped conspiracy theory as evidence for your own nuttery. Stop it.
>> I'm now wondering > You can't use uncertainty [...] as evidence for your own nuttery. Stop it. To wonder aloud should not be so demonized much less demanded to cease.
I mean, sure, it could be NSA. Let's wonder! The fact that no one in public has seen one of those things isn't supporting evidence for that theory. It's even less grounded than the Chinese one.