Live data from Hacker News

A shadowy op-ed campaign is now smearing SpaceX in space cities

arstechnica.com

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: A shadowy op-ed campaign is now smearing SpaceX in space cities

#71
post #40

This is somewhat tangential to the topic, but having worked in PR/marketing agency environments and heard stories from friends, I've found them to be the most amoral places to work at. The agency where I worked (social media marketing) would make outrageous claims and give a lot of "smoke and mirror" presentations to both land clients and give them the impression they were getting more for their money than they were.…

> What might be worse is it's quite possible Boeing is finding out through this reporting. _If_ Boeing really is behind all this, they may well be unaware of the specific details, sure. But so what? This doesn't make them any less responsible. So I don't understand what makes this "worse".

I would personally find it distasteful if someone did something shady trying to further my interests and find out about it in the news, which is why I find it worse.

Re: A shadowy op-ed campaign is now smearing SpaceX in space cities

#72
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What might be worse is it's quite possible Boeing is finding out through this reporting. _If_ Boeing really is behind all this, they may well be unaware of the specific details, sure. But so what? This doesn't make them any less responsible. So I don't understand what makes this "worse".

I would personally find it distasteful if someone did something shady trying to further my interests and find out about it in the news, which is why I find it worse.

Call me cynical, but in my opinion, any company using the service of such agencies, have to know the possibility of abuses and unethical practices that might happen. They may even count on it, but with the great benefit that they now have plausable deniability.
Post reply on HN