Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait a minute... So your company has a Chinese equipment supplier, finds out that the supplier is tampering with your purchased equipment, and your solution is to add criteria to the incoming inspection? No wonder China keeps screwing with you guys. You aren't supposed to eat that cost! Write a PO with tons of fine print that says "We will disassembly units at random for compliance inspection. Non compliant products…
This is also such a good anonymous story that I'd give decent odds it's made up.
The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
611–620 of 818 posts
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#612Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were other considerations like the fact we were actually buing it from large reputable company and what happened was that some employees were doing it with no involvement of the company. The fact is, doing any kind of hardware production in China, you have to be aware Chineese have different value system and you would not be suited doing any business if you throw tantrum at any sign of apparent dishonesty (assu…
All employee actions are company actions. You partnered with a company that can’t control what it’s employees do? No internal audits to make sure their reputation wasn’t being tarnished by a few employees?! Your loss.
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#613Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were other considerations like the fact we were actually buing it from large reputable company and what happened was that some employees were doing it with no involvement of the company. The fact is, doing any kind of hardware production in China, you have to be aware Chineese have different value system and you would not be suited doing any business if you throw tantrum at any sign of apparent dishonesty (assu…
This still sounds nuts to me. Two thoughts: > they typically will not be thinking they are doing anything wrong. They are just testing if you notice and if you do not they will say it makes no difference for you but saves them costs. This is how children behave. Still feels like you’re rewarding bad behavior. You’re enabling them. I think it’s more that you’ve valued the low per unit price over having a healthy contr…
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#614Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, as far as I understand the argument, it goes beyond "Canadian steel is a national security risk". A couple of years ago, Mexico was caught laundering $2B of Chinese aluminum to avoid US taxes. http://fortune.com/2016/09/09/chinese-aluminum-giant-is-tied... The theory, from the Trump crowd, is that Canada is also engaged in similar shady dealings with China. If true, that would put the US at risk.
Even if true, how does that make it a national security risk?
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#615Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were other considerations like the fact we were actually buing it from large reputable company and what happened was that some employees were doing it with no involvement of the company. The fact is, doing any kind of hardware production in China, you have to be aware Chineese have different value system and you would not be suited doing any business if you throw tantrum at any sign of apparent dishonesty (assu…
>The fact is, doing any kind of hardware production in China, you have to be aware Chineese have different value system and you would not be suited doing any business if you throw tantrum at any sign of apparent dishonesty Sounds like the solution is not doing business with them and pushing for a ban on others doing business with them (since this largely has a socialized cost when things go wrong, such as individual…
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#616This reminds me of that old story about the Xerox copy machines that the Soviet Union bought. Where each unit was planted with a image recorder. And for years, the American spy agencies had a great laugh, that they were able to intercept all the documents that the Russians made a copy of. Back then, this was an off-network infiltration. Where the copied images, were retrieved during regular servicing intervals by a X…
Or the IBM Selectric Typewriter implant. http://www.cryptomuseum.com/covert/bugs/selectric/
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#617Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the point is that actual honesty from these megacorps would be so surprising that even raising the possibility of it happening is so absurd it feels like parody writing.
Last week Facebook was reasonably transparent about a hack affecting tens of millions of users.
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#618Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait a minute... So your company has a Chinese equipment supplier, finds out that the supplier is tampering with your purchased equipment, and your solution is to add criteria to the incoming inspection? No wonder China keeps screwing with you guys. You aren't supposed to eat that cost! Write a PO with tons of fine print that says "We will disassembly units at random for compliance inspection. Non compliant products…
There were other considerations like the fact we were actually buing it from large reputable company and what happened was that some employees were doing it with no involvement of the company. The fact is, doing any kind of hardware production in China, you have to be aware Chineese have different value system and you would not be suited doing any business if you throw tantrum at any sign of apparent dishonesty (assu…
Thinking about it more, what you are doing make sense also because tampering can happen with any supplier, irrespective of factory location, given how aggressively states are pushing for spying on each other and their people.
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#619Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Second, would have it been cheaper to manufacture somewhere more trustworthy (another country?) instead of spending all this time/money on your anti-hack systems? I'd like to know this too. Has the West completely lost the ability to mass produce microchips at even a reasonable cost for financial applications?
America has fabs, both old and leading edge, but ask industry giants like Gemalto to even bother to manufacture chips anywhere outside of Taiwan, assemble the final product outside of China. They will never do that, because they look for the cheapest solution. The bigger the company, the less it cares about things other than cost. This is why Mediatek and Broadcom can usurp the market of network SoCs, while making pr…
Well, if your chips are bigger and slower, you will need more chips and mounts/packaging to place them. If you need more chips then the weight of missile/plane/tank will be increased and available space decreased.
So at the end, the 'uncaring' military will receive a weapon which is worse than competition.
All thanks to an outdated chip.
Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple
#620Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m under the impression that China does not make chips, but they do final assembly cheaper and faster than everyone else. I don’t know if any companies do PCB manufacturing and assembly outside of China in large numbers.
Not exactly, PCB assembly is super cheap everywhere thanks to propagation of chipshooters, what makes the cost go up is logistics - what do you do after you populate the board for your part? Ship it across the world, or to another factory behind the corner?
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3014651/sonys-penc...