Live data from Hacker News

The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

bloomberg.com

21–30 of 818 posts

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#21
post #16

Why aren't these attacks constrained by normal corporate firewalls? How does a random server on a navy ship start contacting baddie.china.com without raising red flags?

I suppose the hardware on the navy ship is communicating with a server that is also compromised, and so on and so forth.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#22

The denials by Amazon, Apple, Supermicro and the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs [1] are relatively pro forma , both directed by respective nation states involved in this matter. One of the reporters interviewed on Bloomberg noted Amazon and Apple could be directed by US national security interests to deny to protect the ongoing US investigation. Supermicro could similarly be directed by Chinese national security…

> Supermicro could similarly be directed by Chinese national security interests to protect plausible deniability. Supermicro is an American corporation, headquartered in San Jose. They're not directed by Chinese national security interests, they'll do anything the US Government tells them to do when it comes to US national security.

I stand corrected, thanks.

Supermicro's vendors they use in their Chinese manufacutring are the likely vectors for the implantation.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#23

  The Chinese government didn’t directly address questions about manipulation of Supermicro servers, issuing a statement that read, in part, “Supply chain safety in cyberspace is an issue of common concern, and China is also a victim.” 

Essentially China ils saying "it was not me". Plausible

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#24
post #16

Why aren't these attacks constrained by normal corporate firewalls? How does a random server on a navy ship start contacting baddie.china.com without raising red flags?

Effectively nothing can be constrained by a whitelisting firewall if you have a sufficiently bored actor. You can smuggle data through a variety of benign looking protocols, things that wouldn't matter in the least generally. Your average server contacts hundreds of different public NTP servers, binary repositories, domain name servers every day. If the keys to the kingdom are a 32 byte ECDSA private key, you've lost if you think you can protect this from reaching the outside world.

A method that wouldn't show up on any firewall in the world is simply to delay or drop certain SYN packets. Even if you only intended to transmit a bit at a time through this, any unauthenticated host on the internet could use this without raising any suspicion or even printing log lines in most environments. As soon are you're making an assumption that you're trying to prevent what's inside from getting out things become substantially closer to impossible than anybody would like.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#25
post #16

Why aren't these attacks constrained by normal corporate firewalls? How does a random server on a navy ship start contacting baddie.china.com without raising red flags?

Who's saying the firewall isn't compromised too? ;)

Right so all the stars need to align for it to go unnoticed - compromised server, firewall and other alerting/monitoring tools.

I would have thought one single unexpected packet in these high security environments would raise significant alarm bells and any anomaly would be found very quickly.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#26

Is there an article that describes a bit more in detail what the chips actually did (or were capable of doing)? They only say "the microchip altered the operating system’s core so it could accept modifications.", which I might interpret as circumventing signature checks to allow installing modified firmware on the systems? But how does the chip connect to the network and how does it receive commands? That said, it's…

SuperMicro hardware has very extensive IPMI integration into the mothebroard, which amongst other things can take over and inject frames into the network interface, emulate a VGA device, talk to the CPUs serial lines directly, flash firmware, control the state of a number of physical devices- and this is what it supports just from the web interface it presents by default with the password "ADMIN:ADMIN". My money, bas…

OpenBMC (Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Intel, IBM and others) is working on open-source baseboard management software, https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2018/03/openbmc-project...

> The organizations behind the new project each have already made substantial contributions to creating open source baseboard management controller (BMC) firmware. Now, working together, they will define the vision for a standard stack that can be used across systems and computing environments.

LinuxBoot and Open Compute OSF are working on open-source server firmware that can be measured on every boot and validated against hardware root of trust keys controlled by the server owner instead of the server OEM, https://www.platformsecuritysummit.com/2018/speaker/hudson/

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#27
The only interesting thing about this is left out. Who planted it is clear (someone told to do so) but not a single time is it questioned who they planted it for. Smells like false flag to me.

We think China does X Y and Z but we know the US does X Y Z and the rest of the alphabet. So unless something specific is leaked that shows who actually ordered this, logic would point at the US.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#28
post #16

Why aren't these attacks constrained by normal corporate firewalls? How does a random server on a navy ship start contacting baddie.china.com without raising red flags?

Effectively nothing can be constrained by a whitelisting firewall if you have a sufficiently bored actor. You can smuggle data through a variety of benign looking protocols, things that wouldn't matter in the least generally. Your average server contacts hundreds of different public NTP servers, binary repositories, domain name servers every day. If the keys to the kingdom are a 32 byte ECDSA private key, you've lost…

Firewalls in high security environments aren't just port/protocol based. You lock everything down - source ip/port and destination ip/port. You should know where it is coming from and where it is going to.

Navy ships don't upload via Dropbox.

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#29

Is there an article that describes a bit more in detail what the chips actually did (or were capable of doing)? They only say "the microchip altered the operating system’s core so it could accept modifications.", which I might interpret as circumventing signature checks to allow installing modified firmware on the systems? But how does the chip connect to the network and how does it receive commands? That said, it's…

SuperMicro hardware has very extensive IPMI integration into the mothebroard, which amongst other things can take over and inject frames into the network interface, emulate a VGA device, talk to the CPUs serial lines directly, flash firmware, control the state of a number of physical devices- and this is what it supports just from the web interface it presents by default with the password "ADMIN:ADMIN". My money, bas…

It sometimes feels like certain hardware protocols were designed to be insecure. I remember reading about IPMI issues back in 2013:

https://www.itworld.com/article/2708437/security/ipmi--the-m...

Re: The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Amazon and Apple

#30
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who's saying the firewall isn't compromised too? ;)

Right so all the stars need to align for it to go unnoticed - compromised server, firewall and other alerting/monitoring tools. I would have thought one single unexpected packet in these high security environments would raise significant alarm bells and any anomaly would be found very quickly.

I've worked on systems deployed in the financial sector in high risk environments.

This sort of monitoring doesn't happen in the real world.

Post reply on HN