The amount of sleep also depends on age, obviously.
But old people do not really less than young adults, according to "Why we sleep".
21–30 of 73 posts
The amount of sleep also depends on age, obviously.
But old people do not really less than young adults, according to "Why we sleep".
I'm halfway through Matthew Walker's Why We Sleep. And it's terrifying. The medical implications of insufficient sleep are rather worrisome. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/295665/why-we-sleep/97801419...
I read it, I liked it, I felt like it was not written very objectively. There did not seem to be nearly enough self-doubt or testing alternate situations. And it shouldn't be terrifying. You no longer have to worry about animals trying to eat you, finding enough food to eat yourself, dying of infection, or physically defending yourself on a day to day basis. If the worst thing that's wrong with you is sub-optimal sle…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read it, I liked it, I felt like it was not written very objectively. There did not seem to be nearly enough self-doubt or testing alternate situations. And it shouldn't be terrifying. You no longer have to worry about animals trying to eat you, finding enough food to eat yourself, dying of infection, or physically defending yourself on a day to day basis. If the worst thing that's wrong with you is sub-optimal sle…
Sub-optimal sleep can absolutely ruin you, in the long run. E.g. it's been suggested that a significant portion (a third, IIRC, have to find that article) of chronic fatigue incidents are due to non-restorative sleep. Definitely a problem worth solving if you have it. If you lie in bed awake once per week or so, you surely don't need to fret about it. It just must not become part of your lifestyle - if it does, get a…
I've tried multiple different sleep approaches in order to maximize "awake" time, but defaulted back to exactly 8h/day - my body simply takes 8 uninterrupted hours and wakes me up precisely without any alarm clock. While experimenting, I saw energy/cognitive decline (tested) after a while, correcting when going back to 8h, so multi-phase sleep is definitely not for me.
It is important that people realize sleep cycles do exist, but this seems a bit strawman-ish. If someone says "you need about 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep" I would rather take that as meaning things like "don't get up after just 5 hours" and "don't get up and check ebay auctions in the middle of the night even if it just takes 10 minutes", not "don't panic if you naturally wake up at 4am". ----- Btw, on > Historica…
Matthew Walker in his book on sleep (that's referenced also in the comment you link to) points out, for example, that a lot of learning tends to happen in the latest stages of sleep. So, 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep might well be better than 6 hours + 2 hours siesta.
It's hard to find a fixed 2,5h slot that can be blocked every day. I could only do it during my high-school times.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sub-optimal sleep can absolutely ruin you, in the long run. E.g. it's been suggested that a significant portion (a third, IIRC, have to find that article) of chronic fatigue incidents are due to non-restorative sleep. Definitely a problem worth solving if you have it. If you lie in bed awake once per week or so, you surely don't need to fret about it. It just must not become part of your lifestyle - if it does, get a…
Calm down. We all die in the long run... Want better sleep? Stop worrying and work with your hands a bit.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I close the door. Fortunately I have my own office. They don't need to know. I live in a country where this is accepted behaviour, even though it is not common anymore in this context.
Has to be France
Seems to me like it's more likely to be Spain.
I can live on 6, and feel bad. 8 is good. 9 is better. 10 is common for me at weekends when I have no particular plans.