Live data from Hacker News

Payments on the Solid Framework

docs.solidpay.org

11–20 of 49 posts

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#11

Okay I'll bite. I've worked in both retail and corporate banking for over a decade. I've been responsible for software that processes large payments and receipts daily. I've cloned a few cryptocurrencies for fun and have a pretty good understanding of them. I cannot understand anything on this entire site. Does anybody know what this is all about?

From what I gather, they're trying to make coinbase, but on top of ipfs.

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#13

It is pretty interesting and kinda disappointing to see renowned tech luminaries hopping on the hype train left and right.

Or maybe there's something to it, and it's still being worked on? I have no opinion either way on Solid (yet), but the comments on these submissions seem extremely critical considering they're still rolling it out and it's a work in progress. When I read the OP link above, and the other submission today, I just see an early-stage project that is still being actively developed, no different to thousands of other proje…

Actually, the revolution is still solidly in the white paper stage:

https://github.com/solidpayorg/solidpay/blob/master/package....

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#14
2nd solid post today and despite being familiar with the concepts I don’t understand any of the detail.

Marketing spiel is fine but somewhere concrete details need to be provided without the BS. Very disappointing that Tim Berners-Lee would be associated with something so poorly expressed.

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#15

It is pretty interesting and kinda disappointing to see renowned tech luminaries hopping on the hype train left and right.

That's not how I see it. There is definitely hype around decentralization and something is bound to come out of it. If I had to chose someone in this space to trust it'd be Tim Berners-Lee. He's shown his merit and we know he keeps the best interest of the WWW at heart. To me, his work on (re-)decentralization is just a natural extension of what he's always been doing (WWW, linked data, open data,...).

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#16
post #14

2nd solid post today and despite being familiar with the concepts I don’t understand any of the detail. Marketing spiel is fine but somewhere concrete details need to be provided without the BS. Very disappointing that Tim Berners-Lee would be associated with something so poorly expressed.

Maybe by the third article, someone will tell us what it is.

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#17
post #2

The solid infrastructure looks promising to me. Based on the other submission today on Solid[1], there are varying opinions on whether it will take off and really be able to challenge the big social media. However, I think we _need to want_ this to succeed, even if there are other ideas of what decentralised architectures should look like. It may not be the best system to everyone, but it has some clout with Tim Bern…

Disruption is driven by need though. Uber succeeded because traditional cab companies suck. I can’t remember when people weren’t complaining about cabs, even before the internet, and Uber came and removed almost all of the annoyances. Sure they were bad for labour, but for the customers it made sense.

I’ve never seen anyone complain about Instagram or visa. How can you disrupt services that people love?

I mean, it should be obvious by now that almost nobody cares about privacy.

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#18
post #14

2nd solid post today and despite being familiar with the concepts I don’t understand any of the detail. Marketing spiel is fine but somewhere concrete details need to be provided without the BS. Very disappointing that Tim Berners-Lee would be associated with something so poorly expressed.

A better overview with some sample apps:

https://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/SoLiD

Re: Payments on the Solid Framework

#20
post #2

The solid infrastructure looks promising to me. Based on the other submission today on Solid[1], there are varying opinions on whether it will take off and really be able to challenge the big social media. However, I think we _need to want_ this to succeed, even if there are other ideas of what decentralised architectures should look like. It may not be the best system to everyone, but it has some clout with Tim Bern…

Disruption is driven by need though. Uber succeeded because traditional cab companies suck. I can’t remember when people weren’t complaining about cabs, even before the internet, and Uber came and removed almost all of the annoyances. Sure they were bad for labour, but for the customers it made sense. I’ve never seen anyone complain about Instagram or visa. How can you disrupt services that people love? I mean, it sh…

> I’ve never seen anyone complain about Instagram or visa.

Then you are not listening to everyone. According to some, Instagram is the most toxic site out there, and Visa leeches fees from their customers. I'm not necessarily in those camps, but I certainly have heard the criticisms.

Industries that are ready to disrupt have loyal followings that they think everyone loves them, when in reality much of society would be just as happy to see them fade. The web as a whole is reaching that point. Whether you dislike the privacy issues, the money-driven nature of startups, the demographic who lives online without engaging with the world, or any other reason... the web is not universally loved, despite the many people who still think it is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Maybe it is time for some changes.

Post reply on HN