Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same. I’m actually at google but I’m not going to tell the gmail team about this post because 1. I don’t agree with it, and 2. Gmail team is already painfully aware that any given change will be unappealing to a subset of users. 3. They are probably already here, taking note, considering. Unfortunately we can’t all have a custom UI written exactly to our specifications. Gmail team has to try to do what they think is…
IMHO, you can never win the UI war, because habits. If they improve the speed and make it work as fast as the previous version did, I think most users will learn to live with the new UI.
Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
151–160 of 283 posts
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#152I hope they're not removing the revert option for Classic UI :( Having an API unable to support two clients (Classic and New) would be embarassing from an engineering POV. And from an UX POV, it really lacks empathy (or realism) to assume that the same exact UI will be useful/pleasant to literally 1 billion users. There are all kind of reasons why a given person might prefer UI a to b ( a being older having nothing t…
You nailed it, but large private sector companies like Google (or Apple) have no genuine feedback loops: they do not care, because (1) vocal dissenters will never represent more than a rounding error of the user base, and because (2) there are no obvious exit options.
It's Fordism ("you can have it any colour, as long as it's black"), only with 21st century tech.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. It is extremely slow, esp. on older computers to the point of being unusable. Another app reinvents the wheel and becomes useless.
Yeah my Commodore has issues with Gmail as well.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#154Now there's only starred and unstarred. (Be careful how you use 'important', as Google tries to learn from that and gets it wrong.)
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#155When I realized I can't go back to normal UI, I immediatly downloaded Thunderbird and went back to e-mail clients. I won't bother with the new gmail. Fonts look horrible, it is slower and in the end there is less information density.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#156Here's how I had been using the old Gmail UI or HTML view for several years now. Simply login to your Gmail account. You should see a URL similar to https://mail.google.com/mail/mu/.. . in your browser address bar, just simply change the mu to h and hit enter. You will be taken to the old UI or html view.
I had the option to switch back to "classic" a couple of days back, but now it's gone.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#157When I realized I can't go back to normal UI, I immediatly downloaded Thunderbird and went back to e-mail clients. I won't bother with the new gmail. Fonts look horrible, it is slower and in the end there is less information density.
Did they take away the ability to use the old UI? I still have a menu item under settings that says "Go back to classic Gmail"
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#158Xoogler here, but I guarantee: 1) This conversation (and complaints) already happened, repeatedly and in-depth, months ago on various internal lists 2) The response - the Decision is made, you're change averse/not a representative user 3) Whichever PMs/leads/designers involved had an OKR to do Something, so Something had to be done
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
I must have a super computer because it is blazing fast for me after an initial 1-2s load time.
Hmm. I haven't perceived any slow down. Especially not like others here are saying. Gmail still seems pretty quick to me.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone from Google here? The new Gmail UI is painful
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Fire whoever is driving your god awful UX on web. I have the feeling that UX specialists are actually the problem. When you employ people to work on UX and design, well, they will work on it, even if there is nothing to do. So you get periodic redesigns that improve nothing but justify the existence of a bunch of people whose purpose in life is to propose UX changes.
Interesting point. But could they solve the issue?