WhatsApp Cofounder Brian Acton on Why He Left $850M Behind

Post by notyourday » Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 5:46 PM UTC

jschwartzi wrote: post #211

notyourday wrote: post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is such a thing as business ethics. TL;DR version of which is "Make as much money as possible or become irrelevant note in history" Edit: Oh, please. Downvotes keep demonstrating a total disconnect between HN responses that require pushing a downvote button and say mass resignation from Google or Facebook or Whatsapp or Well Fargo or Equifax that might trigger a response. So yes, the only business ethics that…

There's a huge middle ground between being completely irrelevant that you're missing. Plenty of small and medium businesses abide by ethics and make ethical decisions every day. You just don't hear about them because it's not newsworthy that their management tries to do right by the employees or that they pay their bills on time. They're not noteworthy because they're the norm, not the exception.

Post by neonate » Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 5:50 PM UTC

ohazi wrote: post #86

> At a meeting over the issue he said Zuckerberg also told him: “This is probably the last time you’ll ever talk to me.” I realize this was probably said in fruatration, but I think it paints a pretty clear picture of Zuckerberg's arrogance and entitlement.

Post by chipotle_coyote » Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 5:51 PM UTC

earenndil wrote: post #204

toomuchtodo wrote: post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Charge me two dollars as a first world American, and give someone else the service for free. Infrastructure can be expensive, but not that expensive. Let's Encrypt, OpenStreetMap [1], and Wikipedia run on donations , and these are core internet properties. If you think you need tens of millions of dollars annually to run a chat client at scale, no. [1] https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/9867/what-is-annual... (…

Let's encrypt and wikipedia are not-for-profit. If they charge americans $2/month and eastasians $0, then people will be outraged, and they'll find a way to get it for free anyway.

Post by lazerwalker » Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 5:56 PM UTC

jschwartzi wrote: post #209

nemo44x wrote: post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Boycott them and don't purchase or use their products. If you feel strongly about it go further and organize more people to do the same. Try to convince people who don't feel the company is unethical that it is. But in the end you can't expect because you don't like a company that your feelings on what should happen to come to be. It's like so many people complaining on Twitter about Twitter not banning voices they d…

This is exactly what I do with Uber. I don't use it. I use Lyft. This is because I don't consider Uber an ethical company, nor do I particularly like their HR and other management practices. I don't know very much about Lyft but I have yet to hear anything bad about them which is pretty encouraging.

Post by toomuchtodo » Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 5:56 PM UTC

chipotle_coyote wrote: post #225

earenndil wrote: post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's encrypt and wikipedia are not-for-profit. If they charge americans $2/month and eastasians $0, then people will be outraged, and they'll find a way to get it for free anyway.

This is really a reply to "toomuchtodo," but I don't have a reply link under their post. They wrote: > I would ask for proof people would be outraged. Google and Facebook have used their overwhelming first world profits to fund internet ventures in the third world, and no one is outraged over the actions except for the blatant colonialism the actions represent. Well, obviously you can't prove a hypothetical, but the…