Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't this "whataboutism"? You shut down a conversation by trying to deflect about how others have also done something? Like you said, two wrongs don't make a right. Just by pointing out this has happened elsewhere doesn't make the conversation about China doing it any less important or relevant. Why shut down this conversation?
There's two parts here. Yes, China's doing it, and we shouldn't ignore it, and we need to condemn it and figure out how to respond. That's on one level. On another level, though, any country that has more to gain by stealing than to lose by being stolen from is going to be tempted to steal. Given what human nature is, you'd better expect it to happen. It's like how in domestic society, on one level we expect people t…
How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
121–130 of 208 posts
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#122It's hard for me to believe that all the smart, capable company executives involved in planning and execution of operations in and around China are oblivious to IP risks. There is an obvious upside of operating in Asia, both cheap labor (though now decreasing) and strong work ethic coupled with access to a huge market. It seems to me that execs understand and take a calculated risk when they choose to do business in…
Otherwise it's a double whammy, your foreign competitors compete unbound while your domestic market competition is restricted.
It would also align the game theory to prevent companies from "selling out" to such jurisdictions.
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
It helped the US become an industrialist behemoth, and as such I’d say it also helped the rest of the world (having more industrialized nations compared to fewer was a plus for human development, in the great scheme of things). As such I’d say that the eight-year old would be right.
It also happened over a hundred years ago. We are now in the 'modern era' and international trade is a much bigger part of any economy. The World Bank statistics only go back to 1960, but since that time the % of economy that is trade has gone from 25% to 50%. Much more significant to steal technology today. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#124US companies go into China eyes wide open - they can extract a few quarters of profit from their products and services but that's it; the Chinese will then expect to do it themselves and keep all the profits to themselves. To most its not a good deal. To US companies, that are driven by quarterly targets then it is very much a case of sacrificing the future for the present. And if they stay out of China then the odds…
Reminds me of Goolgle and Facebook comes to my country takes all the ad revenue and the country gets nothing.
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US pried the textile and locomotives industries from the UK This is the sort of argument that an eight-year-old makes to his mother, and the mother responds, "If Jimmy jumped off a bridge, would you?" I don't know if you're an American or not, but there's an very common expression: Two wrongs don't make a right.
Isn't this "whataboutism"? You shut down a conversation by trying to deflect about how others have also done something? Like you said, two wrongs don't make a right. Just by pointing out this has happened elsewhere doesn't make the conversation about China doing it any less important or relevant. Why shut down this conversation?
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ...unfavorable trade agreement wich allowed for assymetrical tariffs, etc. Assymmetrical tariffs are more favorable than symmetrical tariffs, something practically every economist agrees on. Also, why insist on exporting more valuable goods to China, when China remains perfectly content with green pieces of paper instead?
So unfathomably China is against an inverse assymetrical tariff regime which on paper would benefit US but economists would insist actually would counterintuitively benefit China.
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Stealing IP will happen, no matter what treaties and governments try to do. For poor countries it is a path they just don't have the luxury of giving up. I feel like this misses the point. I don't expect people to complain much about IP being stolen by competitors - that feels like an security/internal problem. The issue with China seems to be that they force partnerships with Chinese companies, resulting in wester…
Can't the companies just not do business in China if they don't like the contract? Other countries have similar laws, like it forces companies to hire local people or spend part of the money locally. If China can afford to not respect the IP laws then there is nothing what a company can do, eventually the secrets would be reversed engineered.
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also essentially game theory; the first defectors (those entering the Chinese market) will seize most of the reward.
So now that US companies have entered China, can you name some examples of first entrants who have “seized the market”? I think your entire premise is dubious. The first mover advantage cannot be great because the Chinese government will never allow a foreign company to have a dominant position in an important domestic Chinese market. Without significant change since in government those first entrant companies are si…
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#129It's hard for me to believe that all the smart, capable company executives involved in planning and execution of operations in and around China are oblivious to IP risks. There is an obvious upside of operating in Asia, both cheap labor (though now decreasing) and strong work ethic coupled with access to a huge market. It seems to me that execs understand and take a calculated risk when they choose to do business in…
> It seems to me that execs understand and take a calculated risk when they choose to do business in various parts of the world. If they cannot make this calculation, they should not be running a company. There's an externality here, it's not just that one company, but all of its competitors that are losing out on these IP "appropriations". Then, let's say you're one of the companies that are able to "sell out", if y…
Answering such questions is very, very difficult, but rarely do I even see anyone asking such questions. "Free trade is shown to increase GDP of all participating countries", which is a fact as far as I can tell, seems to be the limit of how deeply we want to think about these things, and suggestions that the world just might be a bit more complex than that usually elicits passionate, seemingly non-negotiable disagreement.
Re: How China Systematically Pries Technology from U.S. Companies
#130People are literally living in a modern version of 1984, complete with re-education camps and stolen Western surveillance technology. No American can in good conscience send their technology to be stolen by a country that wants to imprison and torture entire states of its citizens.
If the PRC government merely didn't follow IP law, that would be a calculated risk. When the PRC steals our technology to power a global game of persecution, corruption, and espionage, it's morally wrong.