Live data from Hacker News

Mmm, Pi-hole

troyhunt.com

71–80 of 421 posts

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#71
> 82% reduction in the number of bytes transferred

No doubt the reduction is important, however as per screenshots, the reported reduction should be considered somewhat inaccurate as he forgot to check "Disable cache" for the Pi-Hole version, while it is checked for the non-Pi-Hole version. We can see resources pulled from browser cache in the Pi-Hole version.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#72
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This should just be dnsmasq, for which source code is readily available and inspectable. You can (and should) compile it yourself if you don’t trust someone else’s binary. You can also inspect the block lists to ensure they all go to 0.0.0.0 if you’re worried about mitm attacks.

you could do the same with ublock

Not on a network-wide basis, and not on non-browsers. I don’t think anyone here is saying don’t use a browser-based blocker too. I use both a browser plugin on the client and dnsmasq on my network.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#73
Wow, Daily Mail, 2663 requests and 57.6MB transferred... just for visiting the homepage. That is a ludicrous amount of data.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#74
I've tried using Pi-hole a few times in the past, but I always end up shutting it down again. It breaks too many things, and it doesn't block as many ads as a browser-based adblocker does. I wanted to believe, though.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#75
post #61

Should be noted this is useful not just for ads, but also for devices phoning home and collecting metrics. Things like Win10, Netflix, smart TVs, etc. You don't have to use every blocklist on the planet if you don't want it to screw up normal web browsing.

It can be easy to bypass by having an IP / another DNS server hardcoded as a fallback. I would bet that some devices are already doing it.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#76
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the news sites are thinking the same thing. "I don't want you to use my network and computational resources (to read the news) without compensation (watching our ads/mining our coin/etc)"

In that case, these news businesses should not be publishing content on the World Wide Web. Users pay for devices, electricity, and monthly network connection, These publishers seem to be stuck in the last epoch. A website is not a finished product like a book or newspaper, it is publicly-accessible data. Users can scrape, restyle, delete, and add content _at will_ whenever they choose to download this content. So th…

So what's the impetus for the news business to be available online? If the world wide web should be a free love utopia of data slurping why would these agencies, who have been built on the assumption that the creation and presentation of their data has an inherent worth? How do they get remunerated for their efforts? Or do they just never try to take advantage of this new epoch and die off, leaving us with a billion half-assed citizen journalists?

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#77
post #69

Since he was pointing out scammers buying popular extensions: I would like to mention that this is a chrome specific problem. Something like this isn't common with firefox addons.

I'd also recommend turning off auto-updates for extensions (which is possible in Firefox). You also get a page with pending and recent updates, complete with release notes if the addon author provides them.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Longtime uMatrix user here. The most frustrating thing about UM (which is the same problem I had with NoScript back in the day) is that some scripts call other scripts. So, particularly when I'm trying to play an embedded video served by another site served through a CDN, the process for getting the damn video to play is something like: Click video -> Open uMatrix -> whitelist some scripts -> reload -> whitelist more…

90% of the time, I just don't do that dance and not watch the video.

If you do it five times with some intelligence, you have rules that you can apply and have most things work most of the time from then on. It's really not a huge hassle and generally the malware-containing networks aren't the ones you are greylisting.

Re: Mmm, Pi-hole

#80
post #49

So I have tried using pi-hole in past and I think one of the problems is - some websites refusing to function if ads are blocked. IIRC - British Airways website uses some javascript that requires ad to be disabled for finishing checking in. It may have changed now but there are other websites too which may or may not work as expected. With browser extensions it is typically easy to disable the ad blocker one time and…

I’ve been running this kind of setup for over 5 years on my home network, and the only complaint I’ve ever gotten was the Google search results that are ads or shopping links don’t work (yes, my wife clicks on these). If a web site didn’t function I wouldnt know it was due to DNS, because I never turn this off. I’d simply chalk it up to it being a defective website and not use it.
Post reply on HN