Off-topic, but that Vollkron font definitely styles 1s very weirdly. I thought it said I.I.I.I instead of 1.1.1.1 until I copied the text and pasted it somewhere else.
Mmm, Pi-hole
11–20 of 421 posts
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#12> Do you use a popular browser extension? How confident are you that the creator wouldn’t accept a $10k offer to hand it over only to have it then go rogue on you? What makes the Pi-Hole organization any more trustworthy? (and the software stack it all depends on) Personally, I'm inclined to trust them both and hope that the long arm of the GDPR will be effective. Optimistic, I know.
Since Pi-Hole is a DNS server running on a separate machine, it just doesn’t have the same level of access as browser extension would. Even if it was rogue, the worst it could do is share the list of domains that you visit, and possibly hijack your HTTP (but not HTTPS) sessions.
Even assuming the use of HTTPS, there are other threats. For example, PiHole redirecting you to a MiTM, who simply observes your connection and can learn sensitive information from the timing and length of your sessions.
I am not arguing browser extensions have strictly less access, just that both PiHole and your extensions have a fairly catastrophic level of access...
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#13I'll continue putting my trust in uBlock Origin on FF for now, until I hear about any malicious PRs that get merged in /shrug/
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#14Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#15Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#16It's an extension but given it's less opaque than a generic ad-blocker I feel more in control and that it's less likely to go 'rogue' like adblockers do.
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#17Consider supporting them (but not too much ;): https://www.patreon.com/pihole
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since Pi-Hole is a DNS server running on a separate machine, it just doesn’t have the same level of access as browser extension would. Even if it was rogue, the worst it could do is share the list of domains that you visit, and possibly hijack your HTTP (but not HTTPS) sessions.
You, and the other commentator, are forgetting that the DNS Server handles all connections, not just those from your browser. Are you confident all the self updating software you use has no vulnerabilities? How about the video games that you play? Even assuming the use of HTTPS, there are other threats. For example, PiHole redirecting you to a MiTM, who simply observes your connection and can learn sensitive informat…
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#19Someone on here recently recommended uMatrix for this purpose and I find that a nice trade-off between usability and request blocking. It's an extension but given it's less opaque than a generic ad-blocker I feel more in control and that it's less likely to go 'rogue' like adblockers do.
The most frustrating thing about UM (which is the same problem I had with NoScript back in the day) is that some scripts call other scripts. So, particularly when I'm trying to play an embedded video served by another site served through a CDN, the process for getting the damn video to play is something like:
Click video -> Open uMatrix -> whitelist some scripts -> reload -> whitelist more scripts being loaded by the first batch of scripts -> reload -> whitelist some XHR references called by new scripts -> reload -> finally whitelist the actual media being served.
Re: Mmm, Pi-hole
#20This is excessive. Amazingly so. I don't mind an ad or two. I don't want you siphoning my network and computational resources without compensation.