Live data from Hacker News

Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

blogs.wsj.com

11–20 of 196 posts

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#11
post #5

Why is a blockchain required for this? Why can't a single party keep this information?

Probably for the marketing.

The link to the actual description is behind a register wall, but there is a bunch of marketing gibberish at:

https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/solutions/food-trust

There's no proof of work or similar and participants can limit who has access to the data they contribute, so it basically is just a data sharing system run by a central party.

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#12
post #7

What does a blockchain offer in this case that submitting a line to some sort of B2B logging API where the logs are made public (like certificate transparency) doesn't?

The usage of the word “blockchain” in a marketing puff piece.

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#15
post #8

Decentralized? No, it's "IBM Food Trust". So how is this any better or different from hosting a database on IBM's server? Secured by a PoW? Doubt it. Here's the closest I could find to technical info: > IBM Food Trust's blockchain solution, on the other hand, is permissioned so invited members know exactly with whom they are transacting, similar to what happens between business partners today. Participants also deter…

Sounds like another buzzword charged write-once database.

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#17
post #2

This seems like a cool, real-world use of the technology.

The problem is that people don’t see a problem and go looking for solutions.

People see a technology and go looking for ways to apply it.

Sure, a blockchain can be used to solve this problem. But should it? Probably not. It’s hard to find technical information but it seems like the same could have been accomplished with an easier solution.

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#18
IBM is quietly brushing its Watson mess under the carpet and now they’re trying to focus on blockchain. However this is just as substanceless and full of marketing fluff as Watson was.

There’s nothing being done here that couldn’t or shouldn’t just be handled with a traditional database. Having IBM “run it” also sort of defeats the whole decentralized aspect of blockchain technologies.

You don’t need “blockchain” to track where your produce came from. This is just a marketing play through and though.

Re: Walmart Requires Lettuce, Spinach Suppliers to Join Blockchain

#20
post #8

Decentralized? No, it's "IBM Food Trust". So how is this any better or different from hosting a database on IBM's server? Secured by a PoW? Doubt it. Here's the closest I could find to technical info: > IBM Food Trust's blockchain solution, on the other hand, is permissioned so invited members know exactly with whom they are transacting, similar to what happens between business partners today. Participants also deter…

Where does anything in this article or anywhere in the title does it say the word, "Decentralized?" Where are you getting that from?
Post reply on HN