Live data from Hacker News

Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

github.com

81–90 of 326 posts

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note that Opera is now owned by a Chinese consortium [1]. Vivaldi is the new browser by ex-Opera people. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otello_Corporation

Is Vivaldi Chromium based?

It is. I use Vivaldi, most patch notes include a version bump of Chromium.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#84
My preference for a well supported Chromium-based browser that's not Chrome would be to use one of the "Blink" based browsers:

https://vivaldi.com

https://brave.com

https://www.opera.com

Opera was purchased by a Chinese consortium, I'm not a fan of Brave's hijacking of ad spaces so my preference is currently vivaldi - which was founded by co-founder and former CEO of Opera and has been adding new innovative features at a good pace.

Edit: been having fun trying out the latest vivaldi, loving a lot of their features like you can add website filters like greyscale, invert colors and sepia, monospace font + disable loading images or only load from cache, etc.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn03GeXWkAEXRP3.jpg

Feels like they're focused on adding cool features users want, instead of Chrome's catering to mainstream-only users and features that benefit Google.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#85
post #5
post #2

Google Chromium, sans integration with Google, and sans updates. Thanks but no thanks.

Chromium updates are blobs and tend to have close ties with Google.

Unless you're compiling yourself, all software is "blobs".

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#86
post #84

My preference for a well supported Chromium-based browser that's not Chrome would be to use one of the "Blink" based browsers: https://vivaldi.com https://brave.com https://www.opera.com Opera was purchased by a Chinese consortium, I'm not a fan of Brave's hijacking of ad spaces so my preference is currently vivaldi - which was founded by co-founder and former CEO of Opera and has been adding new innovative features…

Brave seems to be focusing on a monetization model that prevents third parties from tracking its users.

Seems like a win-win.

I’m okay with them hijacking ads if that allows them to succeed and thrive.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#87
post #84

My preference for a well supported Chromium-based browser that's not Chrome would be to use one of the "Blink" based browsers: https://vivaldi.com https://brave.com https://www.opera.com Opera was purchased by a Chinese consortium, I'm not a fan of Brave's hijacking of ad spaces so my preference is currently vivaldi - which was founded by co-founder and former CEO of Opera and has been adding new innovative features…

Brave seems to be focusing on a monetization model that prevents third parties from tracking its users. Seems like a win-win. I’m okay with them hijacking ads if that allows them to succeed and thrive.

Thanks for the tips. I hadn't heard of Vivaldi or Brave.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#88
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chromium updates are blobs and tend to have close ties with Google.

Unless you're compiling yourself, all software is "blobs".

- Many dependencies of dev projects are simply source files which will be compiled on-the-fly. Or at least that's the case in the languages I normally work with.

- Some blobs are more trustworthy than others.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#89
post #84

My preference for a well supported Chromium-based browser that's not Chrome would be to use one of the "Blink" based browsers: https://vivaldi.com https://brave.com https://www.opera.com Opera was purchased by a Chinese consortium, I'm not a fan of Brave's hijacking of ad spaces so my preference is currently vivaldi - which was founded by co-founder and former CEO of Opera and has been adding new innovative features…

Brave seems to be focusing on a monetization model that prevents third parties from tracking its users. Seems like a win-win. I’m okay with them hijacking ads if that allows them to succeed and thrive.

I prefer each website be in control over their own monetization model and not dictated by the whims of a browser vendor without their consent.

Re: Modifications to Google Chromium for removing Google integration

#90
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why not Safari? Or is the issue non-MacOS OSs

I use Epiphany (aka GNOME Web) and it's like Safari: a minimal WebKit-based browser with no Google integration, but it's cross-platform, open source, and features Firefox sync integration for history/bookmarks/passwords/etc. I can't recommend it enough.

I am never going to use any GNOME product if intend to use it for more than a week. Too many breaking changes, too many feature changes, too often.
Post reply on HN