Live data from Hacker News

Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

massmadesoul.com

71–80 of 131 posts

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#71
In 2003, industry best selling and flagship Razr cost $500

In 2018, Apple's flagship iPhone cost ( starts ) $999.

I still don't know what to make of those "numbers". A lot fo jobs outside of Tech Sector had lower salary now in real terms than in 2003, and housing price are many times of those in 2003.

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#72
post #71

In 2003, industry best selling and flagship Razr cost $500 In 2018, Apple's flagship iPhone cost ( starts ) $999. I still don't know what to make of those "numbers". A lot fo jobs outside of Tech Sector had lower salary now in real terms than in 2003, and housing price are many times of those in 2003.

I punched those numbers into the bank of England's inflation calculator and half that difference can be explained by inflation alone

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/in...

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#73
post #52

Great phone, loved using it until the benefits of the smartphone became too great to ignore. If I ever decided to give up on smartphones and move to a dumbphone (which isn't that far-fetched - I can use tablet for the most "smart" parts anyway) I'd probably get something like a Razr again. I love the tactical feedback of a flip-phone - you know how to answer a call and how to end it, and it has a physical feel to it…

Actually the “close the phone to close the call” is the most dangerous feature in history... It didn’t actually close the call in the worst possible moments.

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#74
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had a variation of that mini phone you linked to (the internals get repackaged by various manufacturers). Mine was exactly the height and width of a credit card, and not very thick. It was lovely in my pocket, so unobtrusive. Everyone thought it was a calculator. :) Had to give it up after a while because the battery was really bad. One serious call and it was toast, and the battery got worse with age. If they made…

Saw something that probably was an iPod the other day. For a few seconds I thought it was a new iPhone (can't remember seeing an iPod in years). I want a phone in that size: - Small. - With touchscreen, - With a browser - With downloadable or even uploadable apps (basic ones like maps and messaging clients would be enough, don't need games or 3d, just don't want to rely on my operator or the manufacturer to create a…

[deleted]

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#75
"The RAZR was the first phone to recognize that cellphones [...] were on the tipping point to becoming fashion accessories"

Meanwhile, Siemens bet (and lost) a whole sub-brand of absurd design experiments on the idea of phones becoming fashion accessories. Xelibri had all the boldness and cluelessness of a teenager getting killed climbing up a power line pole to impress the girls. Xelibri were truly "phones that should not have existed", a monument to organizational bad judgement. (The 5 and 7 models were kind of cool though, but those were absolute outliers in the lineup)

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#76
post #71

In 2003, industry best selling and flagship Razr cost $500 In 2018, Apple's flagship iPhone cost ( starts ) $999. I still don't know what to make of those "numbers". A lot fo jobs outside of Tech Sector had lower salary now in real terms than in 2003, and housing price are many times of those in 2003.

Ok, but the new iPhone has a huge screen, great browser, email, 64gb ram, > a million apps, 40x the radio bands, 30x the resolution, 3x the battery, 100x the speed, video, and more.

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#77
post #71

In 2003, industry best selling and flagship Razr cost $500 In 2018, Apple's flagship iPhone cost ( starts ) $999. I still don't know what to make of those "numbers". A lot fo jobs outside of Tech Sector had lower salary now in real terms than in 2003, and housing price are many times of those in 2003.

In 2003, for most people, the flagship Razr cost £99, or nothing. You were paying £20 or £30 a month for mobile service in a contract that gave you a new phone every 12 months. No benefit or discount for not taking an upgrade when it was available.

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#78
post #75

"The RAZR was the first phone to recognize that cellphones [...] were on the tipping point to becoming fashion accessories" Meanwhile, Siemens bet (and lost) a whole sub-brand of absurd design experiments on the idea of phones becoming fashion accessories. Xelibri had all the boldness and cluelessness of a teenager getting killed climbing up a power line pole to impress the girls. Xelibri were truly "phones that shou…

Oh look who has got a Xelibri https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=39LvqbPPpys#

Edit: I was sure that it is sasha baron kohen in the video. It isn't him apparently but the video is still great.

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#79
post #71

In 2003, industry best selling and flagship Razr cost $500 In 2018, Apple's flagship iPhone cost ( starts ) $999. I still don't know what to make of those "numbers". A lot fo jobs outside of Tech Sector had lower salary now in real terms than in 2003, and housing price are many times of those in 2003.

Ok, but the new iPhone has a huge screen, great browser, email, 64gb ram, > a million apps, 40x the radio bands, 30x the resolution, 3x the battery, 100x the speed, video, and more.

but basic version of XS does not even have 1080p :(

Re: Motorola Razr V3 Cellphone: The trend-setter that shouldn't have existed

#80
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nokia has revamped its classic phones https://www.nokia.com/en_int/phones/classic-phones

They are not the same. Even though Nokia is infamous for not being able to produce a solid smartphone platform that would actually attract app developers, their feature phones (and Sony Ericsson's, too) were always known for having more finished, polished and faster UX when compared to competition like Siemens and Motorola. The Nokia-branded feature phones produced during Microsoft's ownership and ones produced curre…

Reviving the old 3310 got Nokia back into every store in Europe. It really doesn't matter whether those phones are any good or not, because they're not a priority, they're just a gimmick.

They're just a gimmick that's a complete win from a marketing side though. I know Nokia, I've seen their new feature phones everywhere, I've found out that they have sturdy, decent smartphones now (like the 7 plus) running Android One, and I've made three purchases from them this year.

Post reply on HN