11–20 of 129 posts
As I don't have a DGX1 here, training the 2K resolution net for 10 days on a p3.16xlarge instance (also has 8 V100 GPUs) would cost USD 5875 on AWS. (USD24.48 per hour on-demand pricing * 24 hours/day * 10 days)
One of the example translates a full human pose to a video of a dancer. If the network would be trained on the facial pose(?) / features only, would that recreate something like the facial reenactment in http://niessnerlab.org/projects/thies2016face.html (source code for face2face is not public)?
Look into Deepfake, that's the tool 4chan is using for face swapping in their fake porn
I'm probably being captain obvious here, but if this is what's being released for free, I wonder how much better a polished commercial version does, and when we reach the point where we can't trust anything we see anymore. It doesn't even have to be super perfect, even reaching the point where it takes experts about two weeks to determine if something's real or not might already be long enough to do great damage. Fro…
I'm probably being captain obvious here, but if this is what's being released for free, I wonder how much better a polished commercial version does, and when we reach the point where we can't trust anything we see anymore. It doesn't even have to be super perfect, even reaching the point where it takes experts about two weeks to determine if something's real or not might already be long enough to do great damage. Fro…
If you compare OSS or free software to commercial software generally, I don’t think there are that many massive gaps. It’s mostly polish and small incremental improvements, but the underlying tech is mostly the same. Why would that be different in this case?
He would say it's fake, but who would believe him?
How exactly can computer scientists explain deepfakes to laymen?
I'm curious what would happen if somebody tried to impersonate the US president using this. He would say it's fake, but who would believe him? How exactly can computer scientists explain deepfakes to laymen?
I'm probably being captain obvious here, but if this is what's being released for free, I wonder how much better a polished commercial version does, and when we reach the point where we can't trust anything we see anymore. It doesn't even have to be super perfect, even reaching the point where it takes experts about two weeks to determine if something's real or not might already be long enough to do great damage. Fro…
Especially for public figures with lots training data available.
I'm probably being captain obvious here, but if this is what's being released for free, I wonder how much better a polished commercial version does, and when we reach the point where we can't trust anything we see anymore. It doesn't even have to be super perfect, even reaching the point where it takes experts about two weeks to determine if something's real or not might already be long enough to do great damage. Fro…
If you compare OSS or free software to commercial software generally, I don’t think there are that many massive gaps. It’s mostly polish and small incremental improvements, but the underlying tech is mostly the same. Why would that be different in this case?
In this specific case I think it might be beneficial if you can spend a lot of money on gathering training material and tweaking the network. But then again someone here mentioned the quality 4chans fake porn has reached, so maybe I'm wrong after all.
I'm curious what would happen if somebody tried to impersonate the US president using this. He would say it's fake, but who would believe him? How exactly can computer scientists explain deepfakes to laymen?
Well I’m this case the results are pretty good locally but have pretty obvious artefacts too. Especially the synthesised road videos, look at the trees or even more at the Lane change in the linked video.