Earlier quoted context omitted.
My perception and view of the US and it's culture also slightly shifted after GDPR came into spotlight (same conclusions as yours). Just the other day I ended up in a discussion with a US citizen (it started completely harmless and away from culture/politics) and ended up in the same corner: "EU is bad because it limits your freedom, US is great because it gives you freedom". The problem is - the argument (my underst…
I agree with those points and I'd like to add that both approaches (US and EU) have their drawbacks (and advantages). In limiting businesses more in the EU I found out that it generally means less competition and fewer companies (per capita) than the US, in my limited experience of having lived in the EU most of my life before moving to the US and still visiting Europe every year. One of the most common shocks of mov…
The European Union versus the Internet
201–210 of 211 posts
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#202Just take your punishment.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
>GDPR is not a law about "The Internet", it is a law about company records. It applies to Google, but it also applies to the Pakistani food stand on the corner. It affects Google a lot more, sure. It's about full stack owners vs. people who depend on modules to operate, not size of the company. And controlling or maintaining consistentcy across all those modules might be difficult when it comes to GDPR. Just think ab…
If you're using that many modules that you don't understand what's happening with your customer's data and can't easily control where it goes or what it's used for, I'm sorry, but I don't want to do business with you.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
>GDPR is not a law about "The Internet", it is a law about company records. It applies to Google, but it also applies to the Pakistani food stand on the corner. It affects Google a lot more, sure. It's about full stack owners vs. people who depend on modules to operate, not size of the company. And controlling or maintaining consistentcy across all those modules might be difficult when it comes to GDPR. Just think ab…
If you're using that many modules that you don't understand what's happening with your customer's data and can't easily control where it goes or what it's used for, I'm sorry, but I don't want to do business with you.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#205It's super interesting to watch the reaction of the US blogosphere to EU laws. I feel like I'm learning a lot about US culture just by observing the general attitude that seems to be coalescing against things like GDPR. I used to think that I'd been pretty well indoctrinated into the US value system, despite being born in the EU, just by virtue of having most of my influences (movies, the internet) having come from t…
In my mind the difference is that: * In the US: Don’t use social media if you don’t want to be tracked, it’s your choice. * In the EU: We cannot compete against big US companies so we will pass laws that are popular with entitled people to weaken them in the name of social benefits. Win-win for politicians.
It's not about weakening companies, it's about keeping them in line, ethically.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're just complaining because it's EU and not US. American DMCA law is much worse than GDPR, predates it by like 2 decades, and basically the whole world is subjected to some of it (because US companies are global monopolies).
The people complaining about the GDPR have been complaining about the DMCA since before it was passed.
The DMCA was an attack on consumer rights. The GDPR is their extension.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The EU also seems to assume that if someone is making money, someone else is being damaged How did you reach that conclusion?
Maybe I should be more specific to making money online- but nobody collects data that I didn't give them. The tone of EU laws is that instead they 'took' that data from me.
You can still say "I want you to take my data and I'm fine with it" as long as the site made a good effort of explaining what and how they are using it.
Just an anecdote, but people always reacted with shock when I tell them what information is gathered.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#208In my network of friends, which is within the EU and comprised entirely of EU citizens and spans multiple EU tech companies from dinky startups to Giant Unicorn, GDPR has been almost universally approved. We had to implement it, and generally feel better for having done so. The Giant Unicorn employees were dismayed by how little time they were given for such a giant task, but were in support of the law. Everybody is…
I disagree with the GDPR "success story" part of your comment. So far it's backfired entirely. The goal was to provide users with more control, and (from the standpoint of such a user) to reduce relentless personal data harvesting. That hasn't happened. What's happened is more annoying "we use cookies and track you"-banners all over the internet. As a user who doesn't use cookies, these damned things won't even go aw…
Not exactly. What happened on many sites is that along with that notification you are given an option to opt out of tracking and view crazy-long lists of partners with whom data is shared. So on those sites the user is given both choice and greater transparency. (Although I admit usually the choice is presented in such a way that it is easy to accept and difficult to reject - which is actually prohibited by GDPR.)
However on the other hand, as you say, there are sites which only give notification without giving any choice - which is also prohibited by GDPR. So I'd say the law is good, now we need to see it enforced and actually punish sites which do not follow it.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I should be more specific to making money online- but nobody collects data that I didn't give them. The tone of EU laws is that instead they 'took' that data from me.
This assumes that people understand what data is gathered. Which is the whole informed consent that is required by the GDPR. You can still say "I want you to take my data and I'm fine with it" as long as the site made a good effort of explaining what and how they are using it. Just an anecdote, but people always reacted with shock when I tell them what information is gathered.
Re: The European Union versus the Internet
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know why you think I was advocating for free stuff. I was not. I'm happy to pay for content I want. It's what time companies should be doing instead of not charging, tracking invasively, and selling user data. If you can convince people to pay for your content then the market is telling you you don't have a viable business.
I think the issue with GDPR is that you can't deny service if they don't want to pay and don't want to be tracked. Iow, you can't ask them to pay if they don't want to be tracked. That's where the complaint about demanding a free service comes from.