Are tariffs just straight up revenue for the US government, like income taxes?
China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
11–20 of 385 posts
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#121. The Chinese had option of imposing high tariffs on politically significant US agricultural products, like soyabean, which are not very large in $ value, but affect a lot of areas.
2. Since some swing states are highly influential in US elections, the Chinese always had the option of imposing tariffs which impact the swing states mostly.
Both of these thoughts arose from the fact that as a democratic country, the US would have to take into account both short and long term trade prospects. Now reading this article, it seems being a predominantly export driven economy and having a huge trade surplus with the US, the Chinese don't really have that much leverage.
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#13Are tariffs just straight up revenue for the US government, like income taxes?
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#14Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#15I initially used to think China might have more leverage against any potential trade war agains the US, as: 1. The Chinese had option of imposing high tariffs on politically significant US agricultural products, like soyabean, which are not very large in $ value, but affect a lot of areas. 2. Since some swing states are highly influential in US elections, the Chinese always had the option of imposing tariffs which im…
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#16>Proponents of the plan say letting Washington impose more tariffs than Beijing would actually hurt the United States more because tariffs are ultimately paid by consumers and businesses in the countries that levy them. Well, this is actually the fundamental problem, isn't it? There's no way actual trade evens out, so tariffs are the only real outcome here. Even if we "win", it's not actually winning.
The "winning" scenario for the United States is that China agrees to change its IP policies. IP is America's most valuable product, and the Chinese have been stealing it with 0 consequences for decades. A win on this front would see an end (or at least decrease) in cyberattacks and more US friendly IP laws.
China has been having IP laws and protection since around 1980, and China government never said once that stealing IP is okay. It is IP law execution and enforcement in China that is sub-par. Policing is sometimes hard.
Also, I believe the US really wants to treat IP as an "asset" rather than a "product".
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#17Are tariffs just straight up revenue for the US government, like income taxes?
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#18Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#19Are tariffs just straight up revenue for the US government, like income taxes?
Yes. There was no income tax for the majority of US history, and tariffs were a major source of revenue for the government back then.
Re: China Once Looked Tough on Trade. Now Its Options Are Dwindling
#20>Proponents of the plan say letting Washington impose more tariffs than Beijing would actually hurt the United States more because tariffs are ultimately paid by consumers and businesses in the countries that levy them. Well, this is actually the fundamental problem, isn't it? There's no way actual trade evens out, so tariffs are the only real outcome here. Even if we "win", it's not actually winning.
Not clear if this is a feature or a bug.