Live data from Hacker News

ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

inverse.com

1–10 of 116 posts

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#3

Anyone have thoughts on ProtonMail vs FastMail, as a gmail successor?

I think they both have there pros and cons, however I would like to emphasize having both around. It really does make for a healthy email ecosystem which prevents larger market holders from changing the federated standard.

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#4

Anyone have thoughts on ProtonMail vs FastMail, as a gmail successor?

I strongly recommend FastMail over ProtonMail. ProtonMail doesn't support SMTP or IMAP (standard protocols that are a basic requirement of an email service) without using paid, proprietary software which only supports some platforms and is a major pain to use. They also require a proprietary app to read email on your phone. ProtonMail also makes questionable tradeoffs in the name of questionable security gains.

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#7
Protonmail would be great with some usability and feature improvements. Right now it has limited support for imap, smtp, pop3. You're basically limited to the biggest desktop clients. The desktop web client is okay.

But the biggest drawback right now that I can see, is mobile. Their app does not support threaded conversations or any of the newer features that we've come to expect because of Gmail. You also can't use a third party app like k9. So for me at least, it's not good enough yet to use as my primary account. Really wish it was though.

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#8
There are two reasons I'm still with Google for mail at this point: Inertia, and cost. The former is pretty easy to understand. The latter has more to do with the fact that I have a private domain for our family and I've been using Google Apps since the days when it was free. If I want to convert to another service like ProtonMail then I'm either going to tell a bunch of people in my family to pay up (with all the accompanying annoyances), or I pay $50+/year on their behalf out of my own pocket. And in either case I probably get to move their email for them. It's hard to get up the enthusiasm to do any of that, even if I do have a growing desire to disconnect from Google.

I haven't done any thorough searching recently, but if I could find a reputable provider that had a reasonable family-priced solution that would be ideal. The per-account pricing adds up relatively quickly.

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#9
post #4

Anyone have thoughts on ProtonMail vs FastMail, as a gmail successor?

I strongly recommend FastMail over ProtonMail. ProtonMail doesn't support SMTP or IMAP (standard protocols that are a basic requirement of an email service) without using paid, proprietary software which only supports some platforms and is a major pain to use. They also require a proprietary app to read email on your phone. ProtonMail also makes questionable tradeoffs in the name of questionable security gains.

> ProtonMail also makes questionable tradeoffs in the name of questionable security gains

For example?

Re: ProtonMail Hits 5M Accounts

#10

Anyone have thoughts on ProtonMail vs FastMail, as a gmail successor?

Personally, I'm unwilling to use a mail provider that does not offer standard IMAP and SMTP. So I use Fastmail. (And I've been using them since 2002. Is this what being a hipster feels like?)
Post reply on HN