Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Paul Buchheit: Whose reality are you living in? Whose reality would you rather live in?

paulbuchheit.blogspot.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: Paul Buchheit: Whose reality are you living in? Whose reality would you rather live in?

#11

Post by nonrecursive »

gibsonf1 wrote: post #8
ryan wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"When I was in Architecture school, all of my professors tried to convince us students that there were no new ideas, everything had been done. That nothing great was created/designed/invented by individuals, it was all thanks to groups. That the heroic in architecture was impossible and undesirable. That Wright's Falling water was banal, just a bunch of concrete plates stacked up above each other. All of this foolish…

Yes I did - a great book. I liked Atlas Shrugged much better though. :)

I wonder how many people here like Ayn Rand's work?

Re: Paul Buchheit: Whose reality are you living in? Whose reality would you rather live in?

#13

Post by paul »

gibsonf1 wrote: post #10
paul wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The implication is not that people manufacture reality in their head, but rather that they model reality in their head (which is indisputable). You can try to improve your model, but it will always be just a model and subject to limitations and errors. This realization actually HELPS us create products for other people, because we understand that the reality inside their head is different from our own, and can attemp…

There is no dispute about people modeling reality in their heads, in fact I mentioned that in my first reply, but you claim that that model is reality for people when you say As far as you can tell, that frame is reality . Maybe this statement is not what you really mean?

The thing is, they don't just have the model sitting there looking pretty, they are using it to make sense of the world. It's like trying to detect a rootkit after it's been installed -- potentially very difficult because it can alter your whole view of things.

Here's another example, imagine that you are a creationist faced with fossil evidence for evolution. How do you deal with that? Maybe you think, "God must be testing my faith", after all, isn't that exactly what a meddling god would do? Now the fossils are proof of your meddling god! (who else could have staged such a clever test?)

Re: Paul Buchheit: Whose reality are you living in? Whose reality would you rather live in?

#14

Post by gibsonf1 »

paul wrote: post #13
gibsonf1 wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no dispute about people modeling reality in their heads, in fact I mentioned that in my first reply, but you claim that that model is reality for people when you say As far as you can tell, that frame is reality . Maybe this statement is not what you really mean?

The thing is, they don't just have the model sitting there looking pretty, they are using it to make sense of the world. It's like trying to detect a rootkit after it's been installed -- potentially very difficult because it can alter your whole view of things. Here's another example, imagine that you are a creationist faced with fossil evidence for evolution. How do you deal with that? Maybe you think, "God must be…

The perception occurred accurately for the creationist, but then the opinions based on that perception had to be woven into a strange hypothesis in an attempt to circumvent the obvious contradiction between the fact (the perceived fossil) and the mental model of creationism in the perceiver's head.

A person has to be pretty far gone when they have automatized evading perceptual evidence to such a degree that they are no longer able to be consciously aware of the contradiction between their beliefs and what they perceive. This kind of evasion can be seen in cults, extreme religious groups, extreme political groups, where extreme = evading perceptual evidence that disproves your held beliefs. Usually group pressure is involved to automatize the evasion.

Perception (and I've been using it in the strictly integrated sensation sense) is our link to reality that enables us to make sure that our mental models don't fall off the deep end. Evade perception at your own peril.

Post reply on HN