81–90 of 459 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, i don't see most comments saying that here.
Can confirm that what I want is Inbox's UI. The ease of postponing items into the "Snoozed" queue, and low-effort addition of task items, are both lacking from the stock GMail app.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another approach could be to build a brand around their 'enterprise' offerings with SLAs & LTS and make it more explicit which products are covered and which aren't.
https://cloud.google.com/terms/deprecation Formal list of products covered under deprecation policy
Earlier quoted context omitted.
People are complaining about having to switch apps. Users have found something that works and they've gotten used to it. Now they'll be forced to switch for no apparent value add. Why do you think people would be okay with that?
That isn't the part i'm commenting on. It's a general statement on the world that people hate all change :) People have always argued literally every change has no value add for them (and i'm sure for large enough things, there are always people for which that is true). So that part doesn't bug me. But that's not what most of the comments seem to be. Because honestly, if the only complaint people have is "i had to op…
- causes uncertainty (will this still work?);
- often comes at an inconvenient time;
- requires the user to re-learn the software;
- might cause incompatibilities with existing tools.
No wonder people mostly don't like updates, especially if they are forced upon them, and if the advantages are not clear.
Imho, to address the above points, software should let the user decide when they perform the update, and the user should always be allowed to switch back. Note that this might require data to be migrated back and forth, but of course that's the vendor's problem.
Not trying to be facetious or anything, but honestly I wonder why at this point anybody would bother using any Google product besides the triumvirate of Search/Maps/Gmail. What's the point?
Keep is really handy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bundling (including the "Trips") is the only reason I still use any google web client. It's not trivial.
same here. trips bundling the one killer feature why I use inbox. I really hope it makes its way into gmail before they discontinue it
Side-note on Google's communication systems, I watch an email thread at work where it went: 1) Here are my questions 2) I've added responses below in BLUE 3) Additional feedback in GREEN 4) More responses in BROWN and it really made me miss Google Wave. Inline replies within long emails are not well handled.
> Outside of some of the bundling features Bundling (in the inbox) is THE reason for using Inbox. It's the only unique feature. It's the thing that changed how I use email. If I use folders it's the kiss of death for any email that a rule sends to that folder. I want a single list but with some items collapsed. Email went from unthreaded to threaded (reducing the complexity massively. Bundles takes that one step furt…
and pinning!
> Outside of some of the bundling features Bundling (in the inbox) is THE reason for using Inbox. It's the only unique feature. It's the thing that changed how I use email. If I use folders it's the kiss of death for any email that a rule sends to that folder. I want a single list but with some items collapsed. Email went from unthreaded to threaded (reducing the complexity massively. Bundles takes that one step furt…
> Outside of some of the bundling features Bundling (in the inbox) is THE reason for using Inbox. It's the only unique feature. It's the thing that changed how I use email. If I use folders it's the kiss of death for any email that a rule sends to that folder. I want a single list but with some items collapsed. Email went from unthreaded to threaded (reducing the complexity massively. Bundles takes that one step furt…