Live data from Hacker News

Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

bbc.com

111–120 of 131 posts

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, didn't he call sandy hooks a false flag attack or something?

That's not abusive behavior though. It's just a conspiracy theory.

It encourages abusive behavior. Victims of mass shootings have been harassed by Alex Jones fans trying to call them out for being "crisis actors."

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#113
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lol, and the video was all about how the left censors people! Seriously, I never gave Alex Jones much credence before this, but this getting him banned makes him much more credible in my mind.

>this getting him banned makes him much more credible in my mind Not to just be mean, but taken without further elaboration, this looks like petty contrarianism. It reminds me of the disturbing, poisonous following that so-called "banned" TED talks get from conspiracy-minded people based on nothing but the fact that it was banned. I'd like it if you'd elaborate more on what made you say it.

It feeds into the narrative that the major media outlets censor messages that point out their flaws, in a very self referential manner.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#114
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My point is there is a clear bias as to which extremists get banned from Twitter. I'm not saying Alex Jones is representative of the right.

I haven't seen evidence of this personally, so to me it's not "clear", but I also think there's a sparsity of data (these bannings are mostly few, high-profile cases). However, I absolutely do not doubt that it COULD happen, given the chance. Do you have anybody in mind that you would consider his opposite, politically, but comparable in the damaging/far-reaching nature of his rhetoric?

One example that springs to mind would be Spike Lee posting the home addresses of a couple that had nothing to do with the Zimmerman case. It wouldn't be licit even if he had the addresses correct.

And in general I see very virulent rants directed against pro-life people, with death threats and the like.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#115
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, the bullying was uncalled for. And what this has done has motivated me to look further into who Alex Jones is, and reversed my opinion back to him being a scumbag. Seems he is only a few ratings away from going full Holocaust denial in his mission to doubt all official accounts of anything.

He's an absolute, frothing-at-the-mouth nut job. It makes me sad how many people listen to him.

It is partly the fault of the established media that they make his message of censorship believable.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#116
post #109

What happened to the HN I once knew. Anti-censorship no matter who the individual. The fact that we have the majority of people here celebrating censorship truly scares me.

I find this alarming as well but its not just HN, its the tech industry as a whole seems to be moving in this direction in the last few years.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#118
post #16

The video that got him banned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne_wFdA-1oU

This gets me even more worried about the people that still follow him.

How can you say the words he said to that journalist and still have that big following? We have a huge information, media and education problem all over the globe, because similar things are happening in EU. Twitter just did the right thing, shutting one of the channel he had to insult, humiliate and contaminate brains of people with fake news.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What evidence is there that it’s a Russian psyop? Also, who are the “unwitting agents”? And why did this comment receive a downvote? Just asking for clarification.

Also, who are the “unwitting agents”? You are one of them, as an example. What evidence is there that it’s a Russian psyop? Have you noticed that if someone disagrees with a Qanon claim the followers ask, “What evidence is there that my claim is false?” But if someone makes a claim contrary to Qanon orthodoxy, the followers ask, “What evidence is there that your claim is true ?” You can’t have it both ways. You can’t…

To be clear, when I responded to “Also, who are the ‘unwitting agents’?” I was explaining what boxspam meant.

Re: Twitter bans Alex Jones and Infowars for abusive behaviour

#120
post #109

What happened to the HN I once knew. Anti-censorship no matter who the individual. The fact that we have the majority of people here celebrating censorship truly scares me.

It is not just HN. That seems to be the direction the entire IT section has taken. Used to be we would respect DVD John and demand no censorship -- now all with get is that meme that free speech is exactly the same as the US admentment and that it can't be done by private parties, oh and it is not censorship if your employer is haunded down, your livelyhood ruined and everybody hates you if you say something somebody disagree with.
Post reply on HN