Live data from Hacker News

Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

fastcompany.com

11–20 of 147 posts

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#11

It's interesting that while people claim they can't afford to retire, more than half of the population begins collecting Social Security in the US at age 62 ( https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-people-who-claim-socia... ) when those on disability are included.

I know more than a few people who retired at 62 because their bodies gave out, not just because they could afford to.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#12

It's interesting that while people claim they can't afford to retire, more than half of the population begins collecting Social Security in the US at age 62 ( https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-people-who-claim-socia... ) when those on disability are included.

I have no facts at my disposal, but I'm left to ponder how many of those early collectors do so because they are under-employed, unable to find work, suffer disabilities, perhaps are no longer physically able to do the work for which they were trained, or other causes such that it is a practical decision on their part, recognizing that they have no other form of stable income.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#13
post #6

I’ve been so poor my calculated net per month was minus $1000 for about 16 years while supporting a family. I worked and saved my way out of it and know that the inability to save for the vast majority of people is just bullshit. Its an inability to sacrifice and “suffer” in a consumerist society. They won’t make their own coffee or cook their own food or give up cable or Netflix or their cell phone or fix their own…

Downvotes are cool but counter-arguments are more convincing.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#14
Plenty of people can afford to retire, but they spend money like fools and then wonder why they don't have any. Read The Millionaire Next Door or listen to Dave Ramsey and you'll quickly learn that you can save plenty on a low income or go broke on a high income. Savings, income, and wealth building are in fact three distinct and also interrelated things.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#15
post #2

In Australia the official retirement age when you can start to receive a pension (or access your own retirement money without penalties) was recently moved up to 67. The new Prime Minister just announced he won't raise it to 70, which was on the table. I think it's clear that's just a sign of things to come.

or access your own retirement money without penalties

My own?! Holy crap, and I'm bitchin' here in the U. S. because I can't touch the 401K until 59.5.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#16
post #5

no millennials expect to see a dime of social security income (whether or not this is justified is another question), nor do they have any plans to retire because the prospect of having enough money to do so is simply unrealistic for them. i am not the only one that has put their income, expenses, and savings rate into one of those "financial independence" calculators ( http://mustachecalc.com/#/calcs/time-to-fi ). i…

Speak for yourself, friend.

You weren't born entitled to anything. I'm in better circumstances than you for my generation but it's unlikely I'll live to retirement age (disease). Grousing about 'capitalism' or the 'corporation' (or The Man, man) isn't going to change a single thing.

I envy your clear vision of who to blame and where the problem lies but unless you get into a career in politics you're not changing anything. Easier to become an astronaut.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#17
post #4

It seems to me work gave us exactly what we wanted. My parents both swear to work until they die. They seem to have conflated work with a sense of personal value. In doing so, they agreed to give up the kinds of niceties that would allow them to retire early, including pensions, 401k's and livable wages. All to earn just enough to pay the monthly financing bills. Now it's up to subsequent generations to get the calcu…

People used to retire by having a few kids who would take care of them. I prefer shrinking our population, especially as developing countries are rapidly growing.

How will this work in a consumption-driven economy?

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#18
C'mooon

> The IRA won’t make anyone rich. A calculator on the site estimates that if you’re 22 years old and making $14 an hour–saving around $120 a month–you could end up with around $230,000 by the time you’re 65

1. $14 / hour? The median household (yes, I know, household, but wait) income is the highest it's been since at least 1985 [1] at $59k/year. So $14 is definitely a bit lower than "normal".

2. Saving $120/month on that salary is saving just 5%! Nobody is suggesting saving 5% is appropriate. 10% is the bare minimum anyone recommends. Doing that, an IRA at 65 would be worth > $763,000, enough to spend $30k each year for the rest of their lives.

Standard statement I feel like I always need to make: this is in no way a defense of our economic system. We absolutely need to raise taxes on the highest earners. We probably need a wealth tax as well. But we middle classers need to cool it with the defeatist attitudes. The poor have it hard. We, for the most part, do not. We spend too much and save too little. If you've got a car loan, eat anything but rice and beans, drink anything but water, have cable tv, a > $30/month cell phone bill, and complain about being broke, you've got some very obvious improvements you can make to get out of that dilemma.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United...

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#19
post #6

I’ve been so poor my calculated net per month was minus $1000 for about 16 years while supporting a family. I worked and saved my way out of it and know that the inability to save for the vast majority of people is just bullshit. Its an inability to sacrifice and “suffer” in a consumerist society. They won’t make their own coffee or cook their own food or give up cable or Netflix or their cell phone or fix their own…

Downvotes are cool but counter-arguments are more convincing.

People read these kinds of comments as "pull yourself up by your bootstraps!". There are impoverished people who probably cannot do this. But if you're middle class, and you're healthy, you almost certainly have 0 excuse to not be able to retire.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#20
post #6

I’ve been so poor my calculated net per month was minus $1000 for about 16 years while supporting a family. I worked and saved my way out of it and know that the inability to save for the vast majority of people is just bullshit. Its an inability to sacrifice and “suffer” in a consumerist society. They won’t make their own coffee or cook their own food or give up cable or Netflix or their cell phone or fix their own…

Downvotes are cool but counter-arguments are more convincing.

You sound like my sister. By the way it was not me who downvoted you. I didn't upvote you either though, lol.

I grew up around the tone of superiority that you are, knowlingly or not, expressing. It really just sounds like you blame the poor for their own poverty.

That's kind of niave. For one, the economic conditions in our country have changed. So managing to save now is a little harder than it was in the past. Another thing is you blame the poor for being too lazy to do this long list of things but if your hatred were actually sincere you would have had enough introspection to realize that growing their own food is not something they are capable of doing. etc.

The class gap is widening and it's not pretty.

Post reply on HN