Live data from Hacker News

Mastodon 2.5 released

blog.joinmastodon.org

101–105 of 105 posts

Re: Mastodon 2.5 released

#101
post #4

This is a good read for anyone curious what this is all about, and contains a roadmap for an "instance-of-one" via Masto.host: https://laurakalbag.com/what-is-mastodon-and-why-should-i-us...

I've been quite satisfied with my "instance-of-one" via Masto.host.

Mine is a much shorter domain than the average instance that I've had in my back pocket for years, which I find is also nice for a number of interesting small reasons (including sharing links to Mastodon statuses on places like Slack).

I'm not sure I intend to always keep it to just myself, and I've made offers to give accounts to friends, but so far no one has taken me up on the offer. I definitely don't ever expect to allow public signups, though.

Re: Mastodon 2.5 released

#102
post #17

Today I tried another software for the fediverse: pleroma. So far the fediverse isn't for me. I don't want to join an existent instance. I don't want to run a large project like Mastodon. And pleroma looked about right for me. But it's currently only for insiders. (I'm using Linux since the 1990s and have installed different news and mail servers. Maybe my patience isn't what it used to be but I don't have any plans…

> I don't want to run a large project like Mastodon.

There are good options like Masto.host that will run Mastodon for you, but you can bring your own domain. I find that a satisfying middle ground, and it's what I use for my own instance.

Re: Mastodon 2.5 released

#103
post #6

The broad approach to social networking presented by Mastodon and other federated networks is "spend your time/resources on funding the network instead of paying someone else much less to do it." It wont "work" for the same reason everyone doesn't host their own email service. It flies in the face of a broader cultural movement we have: specialization of labor. For instance, the solution to content moderation and har…

As a libertarian, you want a centralized authority to manage things for you instead of distributed responsibility? What does libertarian mean to you?

Re: Mastodon 2.5 released

#104
post #47
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not sure how you could conclude that given that FB is essentially a growth engine designed to drive MAU numbers as high as possible. Meanwhile, people continue to seek out communities that do represent the types of interactions people want. I’d say it’s succeeding as much as facebook is.

> I’d say it’s succeeding as much as facebook is. Maybe I'm defining succeeding too narrowly, and sorry to be rude, but what universe do you live in where this is even close to true? Some quick googling shows the network hadn't even cracked 100k users in Feb: https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/99469840739197657 > FB is essentially a growth engine designed to drive MAU numbers as high as possible Right, and it does that…

FB and similar drive numbers by using shady tactics is what I call it. They have influenced instagram to do similar things as well right? Not giving users what they want, instead spreading it out and making them scroll extra before getting the posts from from friends or other likes. Abusing notifications to get additional usage and other tactics.

I do not consider lack of competing with fbooks numbers as not successful. Unless you are strictly speaking about wall street monetization desires, success of mastodon or other systems to me is whether or not they provide a service that is valuable to those who use it.

Firechat, signal and others may never match the numbers posted by fbook, yet those people who have been able to communicate and share in places without worrying about their messages being stopped by different groups of censors, or worse - these tools are immensely successful, even if they have only helped hundreds or thousands of people and not billions served.

Just because many people are addicted to fbook with thier centralized how to keep them hooked / addiction specialists does not mean it is providing a better product.

Specialization of labor and network effects can be backed into other open source things. The growth of one click installs at places like Digital Ocean is the beginning of this trend imho.

If fbook was the perfect vessel for sharing then phub, whatevertorrent, vpns, and similar would not exist much less be popular.

Has anyone started a MAU chart showing how many users communiques have been shared with govts around the world? Anyone have a tally on the number of arrests in the phillipines (and others) and kills in malaysia (and others) that have been enabled by fbook?

I've people promote fbook as free and state as "fact" that users won't pay for self hosted or moderated solutions.

Fbook is not free, it has many costs.

As some of these alternatives mature, I believe we will see more and more people using them more often. Some paying with cash, some paying with drive space / cycles donated, some paying by giving thanks to friends of family who are allowing them to use slices of their systems.

Mastodon is not better for Kim K, and likely will never be, what is better or not is relative to many factors and that is going to be different for different people / groups.

Re: Mastodon 2.5 released

#105
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's just out-of-scope of the tool in question (Mastodon). Any tool is helpless against Human control. If that is the case the I think I know what you mean by "not meaningfully decentralized". BUT, if we can at least break the monopoly of FB and Twitter into at least a hexapoly, then that has still meaning. The internet's design allowed for many to use it meaningfully decentralized for many years. Also, BitTorrent…

> The long-term solution for this Human problem -I believe is to for employees to own corporations. We're right back to confederation. No one wants to deal with this shit otherwise they already would, hence federation instead. > And by employees owning corporations. I mean 1-person-1-vote, instead of 1-share-1-vote. Managers and CEOs can still exist, but is not permanent. Employee-owners can recall them anytime, and…

> No one would ever agree to this except employees.

Which is practically 99.999% of the world. Ever heard of the top 100 billionaires having control of most of the world?

Post reply on HN