Live data from Hacker News

Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL

bugs.chromium.org

11–20 of 919 posts

Re: Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL

#18
post #5

...I'm okay with this, I think. Has www (http over tcp/ip) not become the default protocol for "the internet" in the average person's mind?

I think websites should just stop using "www." entirely and host directly on their domain rather than a subdomain.

Re: Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL

#19
post #10

Is this really a big deal? Don't many websites either redirect the www to the non-www, or the other way around?

It's about the principle. www is a valid subdomain.

Browsers are supposed to be as unopinionated as possible since they are browsers, not mediators, and their job is to implement the standards of the web.

Re: Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL

#20
post #10

Is this really a big deal? Don't many websites either redirect the www to the non-www, or the other way around?

My site, although one can argue it is a poorly configured (although it is intentionally configured this way), is a great example of why this is problematic.

https://www.aishitei.ru vs https://aishitei.ru vs https://kimiwo.aishitei.ru

I never set up a www cname, but now unless you're paying attention (or actually reading error messages) you might not notice that the reason it failed is because you're not at the domain but on the `www` subdomain. The URL bar doesn't convey this information until you click it and then it shows the full URL.

It's really minor but I also don't see a good reason to do this. All the sites hosted by the company I work for are hosted on `www.` with the intention that it "looks more professional".

Post reply on HN