Live data from Hacker News

EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

techcrunch.com

231–240 of 343 posts

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#231
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 30% of movies in Indiana need to be created in Indiana Seems like the media production is pretty centralized in the US. It's hard to compare with Europe, where most nations have different languages, their own TV stations (producing their own content) and their own funds to support productions of movies. It would be a shame if these biotopes of media production would get dried out because of US monopolies. At least…

Also * cough * a good chunk of those US shows/movies are made up here in Vancouver anyways.

Or Toronto, aka "NYC on your favorite TV show"

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#232
post #7

> The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%) 30% for each country seems really high to me. As usual for regulation, there will likely be high unintended consequences. While in the US and elsewhere…

Perhaps a local service other than Netflix can step up then. It sounds like you are defending Netflix in order for them to continue to offer an inferior product outside of the US.

So to get the same as with Netflix today I now have to subscribe to 50+ services?

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Imagine if every state in the US did this, what Netflix would look like. 30% of movies in Indiana need to be created in Indiana. Netflix would suck, ha. Europe is much more culturally diverse than the US. This is what this regulation is about.

The US is incredibly culturally diverse, it's a nation of immigrants from all over the world. It's just not delineated by state. There are geographic pockets of one culture or another, but frequently a single geographical area has many different cultures in it, so it isn't as easy to draw a line around your culture and make laws to protect it. A culture lives and dies on its own efforts and merits.

It is not as diverse for major film. Most of the film in the US comes from Hollywood.

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#234
This sort of thing is the reason there are so many Canadian channels on satellite radio in North America, and also why there are so many Canadian-produced shows on pay TV channels like HGTV and Food Network.

It's also why the version of Dire Straits' Money For Nothing that plays on most SiriusXM stations is the sanitized, politically correct Canadian version, not the real version that was played on American radio in the 1980's. Though that version does play occasionally on channels like Deep Tracks.

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#235
post #7

> The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%) 30% for each country seems really high to me. As usual for regulation, there will likely be high unintended consequences. While in the US and elsewhere…

Perhaps the EU should be under anti-trust investigation for actions detrimental to consumers.

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#236
post #7

> The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%) 30% for each country seems really high to me. As usual for regulation, there will likely be high unintended consequences. While in the US and elsewhere…

Maybe that's the intended effect, reducing American cultural influence.

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps a local service other than Netflix can step up then. It sounds like you are defending Netflix in order for them to continue to offer an inferior product outside of the US.

So to get the same as with Netflix today I now have to subscribe to 50+ services?

[deleted]

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps a local service other than Netflix can step up then. It sounds like you are defending Netflix in order for them to continue to offer an inferior product outside of the US.

So to get the same as with Netflix today I now have to subscribe to 50+ services?

Sounds like two, not 50+ unless you live across multiple EU states...

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#239
post #7

> The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%) 30% for each country seems really high to me. As usual for regulation, there will likely be high unintended consequences. While in the US and elsewhere…

I was wondering if this could be applied to music streaming services in the future. Forcing Spotify or Apple Music to make at least 30% of their content locally produced music seems... Exceedingly high.

Honestly I think that more doable than 30% of movies and tv-shows.

Re: EU to move ahead with cultural quotas for streaming services

#240
post #7

> The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%) 30% for each country seems really high to me. As usual for regulation, there will likely be high unintended consequences. While in the US and elsewhere…

To what degree is the regulation about restricting individual's choice vs. forcing corporate compliance? If a European user chooses to access Netflix through a VPN, are they in violation of the regulation, or is the VPN provider, or is Netflix, for not doing sufficient checking?

Frankly, it's amazing that so many regional policies, both regulatory (like GDPR) and policy (region encoding) have survived in the modern internet. Maybe in an IPv6 world we can move towards IP addresses not containing any significant geo-IP information, making such attempts moot. Probably not, but it's a nice dream.

Post reply on HN