Live data from Hacker News

A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

portsmouthctc.org.uk

21–30 of 194 posts

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#21
post #5

Interesting read, up until this point. “[As a cyclist], look at the head of the driver that is approaching or has stopped. The head of the driver will naturally stop and centre upon you if you have been seen.“ Please, please do not rely on this. Correlation is not causation, a driver’s head might face your direction for lots of reasons (focusing on something behind/in front of you, spacing out, looking at their phone…

It's not just the face, I always aim for eye contact.

But also as they say in the article it's about judging risk. If the face is towards you you're very unlikely to be in the peripheral vision, so there is a good chance the driver saw you.

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was a lot of debate about this when daylight running lights where made mandatory on all new motorcycles in the EU. Most of it was on the lines of if every vehicle had lights on you would no longer stand out, you are just another light which is also harder to judge distance in the mirror. Where as if yo have lights on but cars don't you are more likely to stand out for thr fact there's less motorcycles so not as…

They are not there to stand out, they are there for you to see an object that exists specifically at a point x. Are you instead proposing the situation where half of the drivers are invisible and the other half is (probably) safe? Just as much as you shouldn't be driving into a motorcycle you should probably not drive into a car. All in all: you're saying is a horrible experience, but you're not giving any better sol…

No you both dim your lights when there's an oncoming car.

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#23
post #8

> Remember, lights are just as much about being seen as being able to see I cannot emphasis this enough. It's terrible the amount of drivers who think "I can see fine, I don't need to put on my headlights". Whenever I'm driving on open roads (100 km/h areas) I'll always turn my headlights on. Like aeroplanes, I think that anything on the road should have lights on it for visibility.

It's actually mandatory in most (if not all?) of the EU. You must have your headlights on at all times.

[deleted]

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#24
post #8

> Remember, lights are just as much about being seen as being able to see I cannot emphasis this enough. It's terrible the amount of drivers who think "I can see fine, I don't need to put on my headlights". Whenever I'm driving on open roads (100 km/h areas) I'll always turn my headlights on. Like aeroplanes, I think that anything on the road should have lights on it for visibility.

It's actually mandatory in most (if not all?) of the EU. You must have your headlights on at all times.

In Croatia it's only during winter time for cars.

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#25

> Remember, lights are just as much about being seen as being able to see I cannot emphasis this enough. It's terrible the amount of drivers who think "I can see fine, I don't need to put on my headlights". Whenever I'm driving on open roads (100 km/h areas) I'll always turn my headlights on. Like aeroplanes, I think that anything on the road should have lights on it for visibility.

There was a lot of debate about this when daylight running lights where made mandatory on all new motorcycles in the EU. Most of it was on the lines of if every vehicle had lights on you would no longer stand out, you are just another light which is also harder to judge distance in the mirror. Where as if yo have lights on but cars don't you are more likely to stand out for thr fact there's less motorcycles so not as…

> if every vehicle had lights on you would no longer stand out

From reading this article I don't think that applies. It's typically only one car or bicycle that needs contrast against the background so that you don't miss them. It's not about trying to pick out one car amongst a sea of other cars.

Even then as long as you're aware there's something there you can avoid the psychological problem of assuming nothing is there.

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#27

> Remember, lights are just as much about being seen as being able to see I cannot emphasis this enough. It's terrible the amount of drivers who think "I can see fine, I don't need to put on my headlights". Whenever I'm driving on open roads (100 km/h areas) I'll always turn my headlights on. Like aeroplanes, I think that anything on the road should have lights on it for visibility.

Having lights on is good advice, especially since you tend not to notice the evening getting darker gradually. If you've been outside since daytime, by the time you realize to turn on the lights it's already quite dark. In my country, all new cars need to be equipped with daytime lights and even before that rule, using lights at all hours has been mandatory.

However, this advice is a bit questionable:

"Flashing LEDs (front and rear) are especially effective for cyclists as they create contrast and the on-off flashing attracts the peripheral vision in the same manner that movement does."

Flashing LEDs as your only light is really bad, because it's impossible to judge distance and speed from a flashing light in darkness.

Having a flashing light on your helmet or handlebars in addition to a normal light may be beneficial but only if you have otherwise decent lighting on your bike.

In fact, in my country there are regulations that require a non-blinking white light on the front, a non-blinking red light on the back and reflectors on the pedals and wheels. There are actually quite strict rules where and how the lights should be placed.

Unfortunately not everyone complies with these regulations, and the worst offenders I see are children. I've seen kids riding bikes dangerously on the roads (and had closer calls than I'd like to) on otherwise affluent neighborhoods. Their parents (and themselves!) had completely neglected to put lights on their bikes (or check that they work, have batteries, etc).

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#28
post #3

This was eye opening (pun not intended) and make me a bit worried as a recreational cyclist - many of my clothes are dark and it seems worth investing in brighter ones. As a driver, I found that using BGE setting of the side mirrors (it's wider out, slightly overlapping with rearview mirror), coupled with keeping an eye on the road gives me a much better situational awareness, and prevents the need to turn my head in…

>many of my clothes are dark

I've taken so many risks like this when I was using a bike: dark grey coat: check, black pants: check, dark grey backpack: check, black shoes: check. And usually my light (only in the back) is barely visible because of using old batteries and forgetting to change them.

Re: A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads

#30
Not too long ago, I was very close to having a "constant bearing, decreasing range" (CBDR) accident that the article is talking about.

I failed to slow down adequately to a T-junction and almost drove straight in front of a truck, despite having looked in that direction twice before entering the intersection.

I'm pretty sure my vision was (partially) occluded by the corner pillar and/or a snow pile on the side of the road and therefore tricking my brain exactly as the article describes.

All it takes is a change in speed to avoid this accident. I now take extra caution in these situations, especially T-junctions or 4-way intersections without traffic lights.

Post reply on HN