Live data from Hacker News

A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

youtube.com

71–80 of 159 posts

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#71
post #57
post #45

I feel that PG needs to make a concerted effort to use "uhm" less. It negatively affects his ability to eloquently communicate an idea.

As I mentioned elsewhere, the use "umms" is only because he tries to talk off the cuff. This makes his talks much more interesting. Most of the smooth talkers you see on tv and youtube have basically learned what they are going to say. They sound slicker, but eventually what they do say is less interesting because it has been pre-learned and thus pre-filtered. This is a general problem with Television and popular cul…

> As I mentioned elsewhere, the use "umms" is only because he tries to talk off the cuff.

Plenty of people can talk off the cuff without saying "umm" this often.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For popular, public content, you could split the price amongst many buyers, like Kickstarter.

Here's an automated transcript to start off with. https://scribie.com/transcript/6946cef33e3c4e3596a819daaac73...

I had a look but the YouTube transcript is more accurate. Compare:

"Why combinator has the people who wrote a mail and email?"

from that and

"Y Combinator has the people who wrote Yahoo Mail and Gmail"

from the YouTube transcript for example.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Startup idea: "Summarize it for me" - Upload any document/video/url and pay $x for the cliffsnotes.

Doesn't even require a website anymore. A Discord channel and a Google Spreadsheet and a variety of payment methods can get this all done

I dont get it

How do you accept payment without a website / app / etc ?

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#74

“The mistake you will most likely make as a startup founder is coming up with your own vision of what your product should be instead of getting feedback from actual users.”

You have to be a user of your own product to really make it good. Look at Apple. Most of how they got where they are is by Jobs, Ive et al. making what they wanted to see, and nitpicking at everything until they were satisfied. Also: "people don't know what they want until you show it to them." Of course you have to address customers' frustrations, but relying on just "data" and marketing feedback all the time often…

There are a lot of CEO’s that use the Steve Jobs argument to justify their approach of thinking they know what customers want.

Chances are you are not really building a product that is reinventing a market and creating new solutions for previously non existing problems, like the iPhone. Then you fall into the hole of thinking you can imagine how people want to solve a well known problem and end up finding out later that, well, you were wrong.

I’d urge people to stop thinking they can pull off a Steve Jobs.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#75

“The mistake you will most likely make as a startup founder is coming up with your own vision of what your product should be instead of getting feedback from actual users.”

You have to be a user of your own product to really make it good. Look at Apple. Most of how they got where they are is by Jobs, Ive et al. making what they wanted to see, and nitpicking at everything until they were satisfied. Also: "people don't know what they want until you show it to them." Of course you have to address customers' frustrations, but relying on just "data" and marketing feedback all the time often…

This sentiment really bothers me. It's frequently used to disadvantage candidates from positions because they're not users of the service or product. It's just not generally true, but it's often repeated as though it were.

It's demonstrably not true that you must be a user of a product to build a good product. To pick a random example: I doubt all pacemaker firmware developers have heart conditions that require pacemakers. I can conjure plenty of similar examples--some from my own work history.

That's not to say you shouldn't empathize with your users. You should. And, that's not to say it's not sometimes an advantage to also be a user of a product or service. I suspect it can be an advantage in many circumstances. But, I don't think it's a necessary condition to make something really good.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#76
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't even require a website anymore. A Discord channel and a Google Spreadsheet and a variety of payment methods can get this all done

I dont get it How do you accept payment without a website / app / etc ?

You send me money personally because you trust me

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#77
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PG has written very candidly of being uncomfortable speaking publicly [1]. As an uncomfortable public speaker myself, when I've been in that situation of being introduced at the beginning of a Q&A session, my mind is mostly occupied with mildly anxious thoughts about how I'm going to get through the talk without freezing up or saying something stupid. I'm not paying close attention to what the host is saying. It's wo…

I didn't listen to the whole thing nor do I care about any one individual thing, but they did talk about the co-founders as well from what I saw. That said, other than that I disagree with you. If someone wants to have their opinions taken seriously they have take other people's opinions seriously as well and can't get angry as soon as people disagree. Personally I think many of his essays aren't very good, but there…

I don't think there's been any "getting angry as soon as people disagree" - he's substantially edited essays in response to critiques. It's pedantry and the presumption of malice that were probably the hard things to deal with, and he just realised that his time and energy would be better spent being an attentive father and partner. Good for him.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#78
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's an automated transcript to start off with. https://scribie.com/transcript/6946cef33e3c4e3596a819daaac73...

I had a look but the YouTube transcript is more accurate. Compare: "Why combinator has the people who wrote a mail and email?" from that and "Y Combinator has the people who wrote Yahoo Mail and Gmail" from the YouTube transcript for example.

Yeah, our language model needs some work. We're constantly improving our engine though. Since we are manual transcription service, we can feed back the hand-made changes by humans back into our model and re-train it. Thanks for checking it out!

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sales is grim work for introverts, you can do it but if it's most of what you are doing then you need to question what the point of it is.

This seems to be the issue with me. I am more like 'laptop' guy who is rather good in researching. I am also keen on observing things. But sales stuffs, cold calling give me chills. How do I overcome it?

Basically - you can learn to do it. You can learn to like it and get really good at it.

Re: A Conversation with Paul Graham [video]

#80
post #67

They really needed a script to follow to make it more focused, and the questions were... not great. Some good advice though still, especially about truly listening to users and launching asap, probably the single biggest thing that startups have trouble with.

Maybe they could do another talk with a list of new points. I've missed having PGs thoughts and feel there's more good stuff there.

I believe the issue it that many questions are too directive: I want you to say "blah blah blah", please say "blah blah blah".

So yes, if the moderator just had a list of open questions, it would probably have worked better.

Post reply on HN