Live data from Hacker News

How America Killed Transit

citylab.com

11–20 of 99 posts

Re: How America Killed Transit

#11

In the Seattle area, the local government insists on ripping up the tracks to create urban "trails".

The OP's article links to another on how Seattle (the City, not 'the area') improved its transit ridership and got voters to invest in transit bigtime. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2017/10/how-seattle-b...

Re: How America Killed Transit

#12
Author doesn't put enough blame on the built environment. If you have urban planning codes that require 2 parking spaces per dwelling and detached single-family homes, the area will not be economically serviceable by transit (nor will it be walkable). In much of America, car transportation is legally mandatory.

Re: How America Killed Transit

#13

In the Seattle area, the local government insists on ripping up the tracks to create urban "trails".

My armchair perspective of this is that rails-to-trails is a federally-sanctioned move and adding transit use to those rails is both difficult and politically hard. It is difficult because leaving the rails as-is means small rail operators like Ballard Terminal will insist on still being able to run one freight train a week so that means transit has to compete for time slots and the operating agency has to buy FRA mi…

FRA compliance should get easier soon, see 'alternative compliance'.

Re: How America Killed Transit

#14

In the Seattle area, the local government insists on ripping up the tracks to create urban "trails".

Look at me! I'm an armchair expert on everything. So "much" so that I put "random" words in quotes "be"cause I don't understand their multiple "meanings"

#fakenews #maga

Re: How America Killed Transit

#16

In the Seattle area, the local government insists on ripping up the tracks to create urban "trails".

My armchair perspective of this is that rails-to-trails is a federally-sanctioned move and adding transit use to those rails is both difficult and politically hard. It is difficult because leaving the rails as-is means small rail operators like Ballard Terminal will insist on still being able to run one freight train a week so that means transit has to compete for time slots and the operating agency has to buy FRA mi…

If you don't want to buy FRA mixed-use compatible train sets, simply cut the connection to our nationwide rail system. You don't need to rip up the whole track. It probably makes the most sense to remove the switch tracks, but I guess you could blow up some tracks or dump a load of concrete on top.

Re: How America Killed Transit

#17
The public transit system used to be privately owned and operated. Then the cities took over and kicked out the private sector. Now we have terrible public transit.

Yes, even the subways in NYC were built and operated by private companies (there were two, and they competed).

Re: How America Killed Transit

#18

The public transit system used to be privately owned and operated. Then the cities took over and kicked out the private sector. Now we have terrible public transit. Yes, even the subways in NYC were built and operated by private companies (there were two, and they competed).

Quite right. Japan has excellent rail systems and they’re all owned by private corporations, albeit with government oversight. However, public trans can be done right, such as the case in mainland China which is state owned.

All comes down to priorities and fairness. Majority of governments and companies don’t have either

Re: How America Killed Transit

#20

The public transit system used to be privately owned and operated. Then the cities took over and kicked out the private sector. Now we have terrible public transit. Yes, even the subways in NYC were built and operated by private companies (there were two, and they competed).

There are also many countries/cities with excellent publicly owned transit, various excellent public services in the US, and many terrible privately owned services (including transit services) around the world.

I don’t think this is an adequate complete explanation.

Post reply on HN