Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can it have happened before and be record breaking? Why the unrelated note? Why assume I am an idiot?
“Record” refers to past data. “Record breaking” means you’ve exceeded the past data, not that you’ve exceeded anything that has ever happened. For example, regular and reliable temperature records only go back to the late 1800s, so any “record breaking” temperature just means it hasn’t happened since 1888 or whatever.
Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
11–20 of 80 posts
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#12It's almost as if this has happened before... But no, it's record breaking drought.
What you are saying is not greatly removed from “well if the world’s gettin’ so dang warm, why’s it so cold right now?” Climate science is much more complex than isolated data points such as a local temperature or river level, and to counter multivariate studies with anecdotal reductionism is the tool of demagogues.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Um, the fact that the last time it was this bad was 400 years ago is pretty much the definition of "record breaking".
uhhh... the fact that there was a time that was "this bad", means that at most it's record equaling.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#14Is this some weird Czech euphemism?
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
uhhh... the fact that there was a time that was "this bad", means that at most it's record equaling.
The fact that it hasn't been this bad in 400 years suggests that it's a capital-B Big problem though.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Record” refers to past data. “Record breaking” means you’ve exceeded the past data, not that you’ve exceeded anything that has ever happened. For example, regular and reliable temperature records only go back to the late 1800s, so any “record breaking” temperature just means it hasn’t happened since 1888 or whatever.
Would you include these stones as data? They're certainly a record of low water levels.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#17It's almost as if this has happened before... But no, it's record breaking drought.
The cause of the current drought is record levels of heat. Despite statistically high levels of rain fall, the temperature of the region is so high that the rivers are drying up anyway.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#18"If you see me, you will weep. So low was the water in 2018."
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Um, the fact that the last time it was this bad was 400 years ago is pretty much the definition of "record breaking".
uhhh... the fact that there was a time that was "this bad", means that at most it's record equaling.
Re: Sinister 'hunger stones' with dire warnings have surfaced as water levels drop
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that it hasn't been this bad in 400 years suggests that it's a capital-B Big problem though.
We will only see the comet lovejoy every 622 years, that doesn't suggest it's a problem at all, let alone a big one. The fact that the water levels are very low suggest there's a big problem, that we haven't seen them this low in 400 years suggests only that we've seen them this low before and that the world has survived that.