Live data from Hacker News

Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

spiegel.de

121–130 of 156 posts

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#121
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> determined to burnish their brand on Instagram Stop projecting, 99% of people do not give a shit about this

Instagram has 700MM daily actives. The world doesn't have fifty billion people. Who's projecting exactly?

And is your claim that the vast majority of these users are curating a personal brand, as opposed to simply sharing with friends and family, actual corporate brands maintaining an online presence, or any other use case besides?

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really appreciate you using the term “classist”. I think that term, and not “racist”, needs to be much more widely applied these days. That being said, I really enjoyed the author’s post. If anything, the people who are going to these places are the social climbing, upwardly mobile middle class, determined to burnish their brand on Instagram. Also the free flow of tourists is a problem that parallels a lot of other…

> determined to burnish their brand on Instagram Stop projecting, 99% of people do not give a shit about this

Actually, I read literally in the last few days that a survey indicated 'Instagramability' was the #1 issues for Millenials in their choice of destinations. I think it was the Globe and Mail, sorry I don't have the link. That kind of threw me a little, but I think 'it's a thing'.

There are many little tourist spots where 'selfies' are indeed a problem.

That said, we've always been taking photos on vacay. So maybe it's just that we can easily click-and-share ...

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the zoo problem all over again. Animal-rights advocates frequently argue, not without some justification, that it's unethical and exploitative to capture wild animals and lock them up in cages so that we can gawk at them. So let's follow their advice in a hypothetical sense and get rid of zoos, circuses, even pet stores. Fast-forward a generation or two and let's imagine how that might turn out. The people from…

> And decrying "mass tourism," as Russell puts it, is nothing but code for "Only a few wealthy people should get to experience this." "Nothing but" is an incorrect over-reduction. Like any high-volume human activity, mass tourism can have real impacts. Concern over those impacts is likely to exist entirely independently of wealth-favoring classism. And whether the experience is limited only to the wealthy depends wha…

Lottery is what they do for hajj in mecca.

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#124
post #5

I grew up with stories of people like Maco Polo and love of travel but my recent trips to Europe has almost repulsed and disillusioned me. Tiny European countries are being swamped by huge swath of tourists, everyone with Rick Steve’s guidebook, they all go look at exact same thing, take exact same pictures and even eat at exact same recommended restaurants. There is a lot to see and little to reflect when you are am…

I'm about to launch a startup which if it works well will distribute experiences, moving people away from all getting the same recommendations for the same places because some algorithm created the recommendation. The problem with crowd sourced averages is that the curve is exponential. If there are 2 places with 4 reviews and one has a 3.5 rating and the other a 4.5 rating more people will go to the 4.5 rated place.The increase in traffic becomes a self-fulfilling cycle of validation. Bibimapp is a social place recommendation engine using the follower / following model. You can signup for early beta access here: bibimapp.com

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The hedonic rush of social media is an unfortunate aspect to modern travel. Vacations and trips have always had the aspect where the traveler plans how to tell friends/family about the trip after the fact. However, I've caught myself mentally planning out a social media post about something I'm seeing right at the moment. I wonder how we would treat our travels differently if somehow we were not allowed to share anyt…

I go back and forth on this. On the one hand, I find it silly that literally millions of people take the exact same shot of things like the clock tower in the old town square of Prague and then post them online for a few cheap "likes." But if I didn't shoot a few photos there, I might not remember the great meal I had seated at the base with a few friends that was such an enjoyable time. Small details fade, but photo…

For me the fact there are 1 million pictures of that clock online is irrelevant. People follow others on Instagram either because they are interested in what the person does or they find the other places and pictures interesting which have been posted in the past and would like to see more.

No one can see everything in the world so it is more like curating it, you follow a bunch of curators, see a bunch of stuff, for some stuff a photo is enough, for others it makes you want to see it yourself.

I have had loads of travel ideas from Instagram and have visited lots of places after seeing posts on Instagram.

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#126
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Most people I know practice some variant of a digital leave-no-trace rule: don't post photos in publicly-trafficked areas of the internet, or if you do then don't say where they were taken. It's not so much gatekeeping as ensuring people who want to experience that beauty have to put in the work - read terribly-designed websites, meet actual people and gain their trust, or even take a backcountry travel class which…

It seems like you're assessing this in a very abstract way, as evidenced by your "what if we took this logic to the extreme" examples. I assure you your perspective changes once you have skin in the game and are invested in an activity which is substantially diminished by the introduction of a large number of uncaring people.

> invested in an activity

Odd phrase. "Invested" in your own amusement? And that trumps others' right to be in the same place? The ones with "skin in the game" are the residents, owners, and/or official caretakers. If they want to let the unwashed masses in, as seems to be the case, who are you to overrule them? Instead of trying to exclude people, maybe we should educate people about what not to do and why not, providing facilities to contain the damage, hiring personnel to enforce rules and/or ameliorate damage as much as they can, etc.

I've been an active hiker, occasional backpacker, etc. for many years. Longer than most HNers have been alive. I've seen plenty of the damage that crowds can do. But I still realize that turning public places into private preserves for the most privileged is not an acceptable alternative.

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#127
post #65

Recently, in the german edition of the Spiegel, there was a similar column[1] saying there was "something really going wrong" when a flight from Berlin to Cologne costs 15€ while the train ticket for the same destinations costs 120€. The same article said that the flights were "absurdly cheap" and that the budget airlines are "displaying the type of capitalism that is disconnected from reality". Im not joking. The qu…

Journalism aside, what is the reason? Are railways really that inefficient? I remember the RyanAir CEO once saying he could do base fares for free if it weren't for airport taxes. I love travelling on trains not to mention the environmental benefits but the cost was unjustifiable compared to flying in Europe.

> Journalism aside, what is the reason? Are railways really that inefficient?

Most likely they (are forced to) cross-subsidize the non-profitabele routes from the profitable ones like Berlin-Cologne. Unlike national railways, cheap airlines can choose which routes they want to serve.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_subsidization) (https://johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/2018/06/cross-subsidies.h...)

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#128
post #6

Always worth posting Wallace's quote on the subject: "To be a mass tourist, for me, is to become a pure late-date American: alien, ignorant, greedy for something you cannot ever have, disappointed in a way you can never admit. It is to spoil, by way of sheer ontology, the very unspoiledness you are there to experience. It is to impose yourself on places that in all noneconomic ways would be better, realer, without yo…

I notice that for 99% of the places we go, if we just hike 10 minutes from the ‘touristic entrypoint’, places are deserted unless you can get there by car. Even in extremely densely packed places like Hong Kong or tourist places where in the weekend many people go walking; if you just go a bit further, there is no one for hours. You do not need to go mountaineering for that. A lot of people like nature but abhor walking, so in places like in Spain where I go often you see hundreds of tourists on the picnic place deep in the forest on the mountain you can drive to, but, again, 10 minutes walk on a solid nice path which is forbidden for cars, you will find no people at all. Even or maybe especially in high season (walking in heat seems even worse for people; I love it).

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> determined to burnish their brand on Instagram Stop projecting, 99% of people do not give a shit about this

Actually, I read literally in the last few days that a survey indicated 'Instagramability' was the #1 issues for Millenials in their choice of destinations. I think it was the Globe and Mail, sorry I don't have the link. That kind of threw me a little, but I think 'it's a thing'. There are many little tourist spots where 'selfies' are indeed a problem. That said, we've always been taking photos on vacay. So maybe it'…

My parents did not even bring a camera on vacation; they considered it an annoying habit of tourists and that is 30+ years ago. It had the sideeffect that we did not get flagged as tourists but as locals/expaths which is better usually. With smartphones all of that changed ofcourse.

Re: Paradise Lost: How Tourists Are Destroying the Places They Love

#130
Why bother traveling? Well I live in the UK and want to experience:

-Swimming with sea turtles in the wild

-Seeing whales breach right in front of me

-The feel of the finest sand I have ever experienced at Whitehaven between my toes

-Swimming in the warm sea

-Learning to surf with the perfect waves

-Sleeping in a ger with a family in Mongolia and getting an insight into how they live, what is important to them, understanding the things which can make people happy (which is very different to what lots of people think makes you happy at first glance)

-Hearing the emotion in a guides voice as he talks about the personal loss his family had due to communism, feeling connected to someone and caring instead of reading a fact in a book and it meaning very little

-Looking up at buildings I have seen countless times in photos and yet speechless, as the photo had zero impact on me yet seeing it in real life is amazing. For example the Taj Mahal blew me away, looking at it from different angles, seeing the detail close up, getting a true feel of the scale and spectacle of it.

-Dancing on the sand in bare feet through the night at a full moon party surrounded by people who are there to have fun and be happy. Sharing moments with other people. Moments that you can recall in a heartbeat throughout your life and mean something to you.

-Going to iconic places from films, tv, books from your childhood and feeling that sense of excitement which seems to erode away as we get older, but as an adult you still get that buzz when it is seeing something that meant something to you as a kid.

-Tasting home cooked food from an Indian family which tastes nothing like any Indian food I have ever tasted in the UK.

-Being surrounded by wild deer and feeding them special deer cookies. Laughing as they shake their heads around and then having to run away as too many of them surround us.

-Experiencing the lack of things, the lack of drinkable water from a tap, the lack of hygienic washing facilities, the lack of western toilets and getting so much more appreciation for what we have.

-Hearing what local Tibetans thinks about Tibet and China and contrasting it to what is put across publicly

-Seeing a sky full of stars reaching out to us from the opposite direction and being in the middle of the ocean or on an island without any lights on and get amazing views devoid of light pollution.

-Seeing how unfair the world is and questioning so much about life and how we are currently living it. Perhaps making life-changing choices, moving to a different country, changing vocations, etc.

-Filling up your senses with things which aren't available in the UK

I mean I could go on and on and on. I am 34 and have taken a year off to travel the world, seeing 20 countries, getting some classic Instagram snaps, drinking with a bunch of British people in remote places, doing things which are cliché and doing something which I don't even like for no good reason. Finding the most British food I can and being happy to taste coke. But that is all just one small part of the experience. When you have been in Asia for 5 months and have basically had a stomach which has never quite been completely right, the most western classic food can be very much welcomed. I personally find it tiresome to hear people for ever complaining about what you should and shouldn't do. If you want a Starbucks in Vietnam then have one, you don't have to drink their (very different) coffee (I have given up coffee so not something for me personally). If you like McDonald's in Malaysia then go have it (McDonald's is great in terms of something safe, reliable, cheap, easy, although not much good for me as a vegetarian).

Taking a year off to travel is one of the best decisions I have made. I am confident it will change my life (it already has) and also confident it will create memories which will stay with me and something I will always look back on positively.

Post reply on HN