Live data from Hacker News

AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

techcrunch.com

51–60 of 75 posts

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#51

LightSail is the only vendor in this space to offer Windows hosting.

I know they're not listed in the comparison, however Vultr has superior Windows Server hosting as compared to LightSail. Their network is a lot faster and their servers are better. I aggressively recommend Vultr over LightSail if you're using Windows for something.

I have nothing but good things to say about Vultr. Plus they're one of the few providers with a Sydney datacentre presence.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#52
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe OVH, Scaleway and Hetzner are better than DO and Linode in that regard.

In my experience OVH support is completely useless.. you have to wait for ages before having a response, and when you get it, it's useless...

Sadly I second that. Also I had problem with their "DDoS protection" which detected false-positive DDoS attack. I got instance suspended after 6 days after payment for next month without any refund. They noticed "weird" traffic to my instance where I had installed Cloud9 [0][1] and I assume built-in terminal was flooding instance with TCP-SYN packets when I was using it. I am glad that I haven't left anything inside, because I lost access to this instance and storage. Before that, I thought such protection rather stops instances not drops them with mounted SSD disks to do not impose an impact on other instances.

[0]: https://github.com/c9/core

[1]: https://aws.amazon.com/cloud9

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Scaleaway is meaningless unless you're located in Europe. If you're in the developed world, $2 vs $5 etc does not matter in most cases. The most important factor is that your host does what you need it to do, that the network is excellent and your servers are located where you need them to be. If you're an American business you'd be foolish to host your servers in the EU. Locating your servers in the EU opens you up…

I am European and it's 11 here; I'm talking to an European audience. OVH has got a datacenter in Canada with good prices, compared to the rip-off Linode is.

>I am European and it's 11 here; I'm talking to an European audience.

And next time you should have mentioned it in your first reply. Instead of going in full force trashing other competitors with your new account. There are lots of international audience here, from Asia to US and Australia, where Scaleway doesn't serve.

Welcome to HN, lets not make HN the same place as reddit.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#54
post #48
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My experience with Scaleway is that most of the time things are fine, but over 2-3 years there have been multiple very very annoying outages that have made me want to go back to DO, where I've had no issues whatsoever. Also, I'm not sure if it's just me being an idiot or not - but sometimes my instances have become unresponsive and I've had to reboot them with a newer bootscript from the Scaleway UI to get them worki…

And how is the performance of the "Avoton" Atom CPUs?

I can't say for sure since I've not benchmarked performance - my python/ruby/C# web applications are not very cpu intensive.

FWIW my Scaleway instances feel way more sluggish than my DO instances - not sure if that's from the CPUs or network disks.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#55
post #42

This is probably based on the new T3 release. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/aws-announces-avai... I'm guessing they're able to do burstable offerings with better baseline and burst at a lower cost than before.

That would make sense. But T3 are comparatively speaking, much slower than DO and Linode. When Lightsail were first released those benchmarks won't any good at all.

The only reason for using Lightsail is you want all those Amazon Services, which your LightSail can hook up free of transfer using Private Network.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#56

Wish Google Cloud could have this kind of price point. 1vCPU + 1GB RAM on GCP is $19.22

wtf 2 vCPU + 2 GB RAM is about € 2,50 ($3.00) on https://hetzner.cloud . (Not affiliated, just a happy customer.)

AFAICS, it's 1 vCPU + 2 GB RAM for €2.50.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#57

Wish Google Cloud could have this kind of price point. 1vCPU + 1GB RAM on GCP is $19.22

wtf 2 vCPU + 2 GB RAM is about € 2,50 ($3.00) on https://hetzner.cloud . (Not affiliated, just a happy customer.)

I have one of these too, run a PostgreSQL server. You get fantastic fsync performance for that price too. Not Optane level, but almost at the same performance as a dedicated Intel S3700.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#58
One quick question about LightSail Load Balancers: Is the outbound traffic from the Load Balancer to the Internet is charged separately or it is taken from the instances quota?

Scanned through the FAQ but couldn't find a clear answer.

Re: AWS cuts in half the price of most of its Lightsail virtual private servers

#60

On the far low end, BuyVM has a $15/year plan (1 core, 128M ram, 15G disk, 500G bandwidth). Has been working well so far (a few years), though haven't really been close to any resource limits (yet).

Depending what core that is, you get more on the Google Cloud free tier (600MB RAM, 30GB disk). But: only 30GB outgoing bandwidth.
Post reply on HN