Live data from Hacker News

Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

tomshardware.com

21–30 of 60 posts

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#21
post #16

This seems like someone testing the waters. I fear as they fall further behind the behaviour may become more desperate.

I think Hanlon's razor is more correct here.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#23
post #3

How do you gaffe this bad? How is someone that incompetent in the decision making loop? Some random engineer creating the ucode or uploading it to the web doesn't come up with this kind of idea to change license language. These are edicts from management. I'd love for that conversation to leak in full.

Companies like IBM or Oracle have had these clauses for decades to prevent users from comparing performance.

Such EULA clauses need to be put to the test and overturned for the anti-consumer monopolistic garbage they are.

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#25

But at the end of the day who would have given a shit about the license on a cpu? It would have been ignored.

People who play by the rules in this space, which includes (many) open source developers. Flaunting the ill-conceived license is one choice, getting it fixed is a better choice.

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#26
post #21
post #16

This seems like someone testing the waters. I fear as they fall further behind the behaviour may become more desperate.

I think Hanlon's razor is more correct here. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

This is Intel, Hanlon doesn't apply.

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#27
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I saw a tweet somewhere (IIRC in the anandtech sidebar, unfortunately I'm not finding it right now) where the poster speculated that it was the EULA for a beta version of the microcode which leaked into the final version.

> the poster speculated that it was the EULA for a beta version of the microcode I don't see how this changes anything at all.

Because people are irrational and clickbait runs rampant.

If they contract testing of the beta to a 3rd party, they don't want them running benchmarks because if they get released, news organizations will jump on it, broadcasting the performance hit.

This matters because when later beta versions improve performance, the news about the improved performance doesn't spread nearly as much. Even if it does, the first impression sticks, and there's nothing Intel will be able to do about it.

Re: Intel Responds to Complaints About Microcode Benchmarking Ban

#29
post #10
post #3

How do you gaffe this bad? How is someone that incompetent in the decision making loop? Some random engineer creating the ucode or uploading it to the web doesn't come up with this kind of idea to change license language. These are edicts from management. I'd love for that conversation to leak in full.

I saw a tweet somewhere (IIRC in the anandtech sidebar, unfortunately I'm not finding it right now) where the poster speculated that it was the EULA for a beta version of the microcode which leaked into the final version.

Helpful side-effect of this leak: benchmark public reaction.
Post reply on HN