71–80 of 129 posts
The speed is surprisingly reasonable. Testing with a simple loop, I get about 1.3-1.4 million loops per second in python3, 2 million loops per second in python2, 14.5 million loops in pypy, and 0.61 million loops in the browser. My code basically calls int(time.time()) until its value changes, doing i+=1 for every time it did not change (n=10 for every platform (python2/3/pypy/browser)). My browser is Firefox 61, ful…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you're so afraid that this is dangerous, why do you post malicious code? That's not malicious code... it removes files from a sandbox... you can refresh the page and see for yourself. > And if you're so clever to post that code There's no need to be rude... there's an honest question and lack of understanding in my post - educate me, don't talk down to me. > why don't you try similar code to see if it really has…
Well why doesn't this apply to JS? The python interpreter is running in the JS sandbox
File "", line 2
return f'{fname} {surname} is {age}.'
^So this is a subset of Python or something like that?
File " ", line 2 return f'{fname} {surname} is {age}.' ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax So this is a subset of Python or something like that?
This is pretty old, and hasn't seen an update in over a year. I never understand why links links this get posted with no discussion to start it off with. Also, wouldn't this be better implemented with WASM?
The speed is surprisingly reasonable. Testing with a simple loop, I get about 1.3-1.4 million loops per second in python3, 2 million loops per second in python2, 14.5 million loops in pypy, and 0.61 million loops in the browser. My code basically calls int(time.time()) until its value changes, doing i+=1 for every time it did not change (n=10 for every platform (python2/3/pypy/browser)). My browser is Firefox 61, ful…
I'd love there to be a client-side webapp development system using Python with feature and output parity to JavaScript. If it was a product, I would buy it.