Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whether it's substantially better for deep learning depends on whether they chose to neuter fp16 like they did in all other consumer GPUs. The main bottleneck is not actually the size of the model per se (sizes of the models have been mostly going _down_ as of late), it's the size of the batch during training. Both batch size and model size determine the size of the main memory hog: activations that you need to keep…
I wasn't aware that the Jetson TX1 and TX2 supported fp16; that's interesting and good to know. Thanks for the heads up.
Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
261–270 of 392 posts
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
Titan V is a $3000 card. Getting close to that performance on a $1000 card is a big leap forward.
Good point, but what about the comparison with the old 10-series Titan Xp (released at $1200)? The 20-series improved peak GFLOPS perf by a meager 10%. I still would have expected more from upgrading from 16nm to 12nm. I guess floating point perf wasn't a priority for Nvidia in this microarchitecture refresh...
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#263Why would we want raytracing as for 'gaming' as opposed to the rasterizers we have now? Is this a gimmick or are there algorithms for post processing and the like that could take advantage of this?
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#264Any clue on how this thing will compare to a 1080 TI?
In terms of real time raytracing the RTX will blow the GTXs out of the water... For anything else? Remains to be seen.
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#265Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#266Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#267Since the post with the product page got merged here: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/rtx-2080... Most of it is dramatically lit renderings of fans and vacuous marketing-speak of course, but there's a tidbit near the bottom of the page about NVLink I find interesting. "GeForce RTX™ NVLINK™ Bridge The GeForce RTX™ NVLink™ bridge connects two NVLink SLI-ready graphics cards with 50X the transfer ban…
> Do you think this will be the GPU generation when consumer motherboards capable of pushing things to the GPU by NVLink will appear as well? first you'll need CPUs that support NVLink, and that's currently limited to the not so consumer oriented POWER9.
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#268Putting AI/ML aside, I have a question for graphics experts or/and gamers: what is the practical [1] ceiling of the current champion, the 1080ti? I was under impression that that card already was much more than most people needed. In other words, is the new generation only useful for 4K gaming? [1] By "practical" I mean on 1440p@144Hz monitors.
Re: Nvidia announces RTX 2000 GPU series with ‘6x more performance’ and ray-tracing
#269I am usually able to keep a card for several generations before I can't get 60fps at 1080p in games anymore. Unless you're a professional gamer I don't get the appeal of throwing that kind of money at a card.