Live data from Hacker News

Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

bbc.com

31–40 of 117 posts

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#31
post #15

Have people forgotten they can use mobile apps?

Not everyone has a phone. Not everyone has that app (whatever it is... the airport, the airline, the travel agency), using an app is always harder than looking at the real-time displays especially if your hands are full of luggage.

>Not everyone has a phone.

Corollary:

A few do have a phone, but it is not a smartphone.

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#32
post #15

Have people forgotten they can use mobile apps?

The airport's whiteboard backup plan is interesting but my first thought was also that all of this info is available online or through the airline apps.

In my experience, changes often show up in Kayak ahead of the airport dashboards. I check apps or notifications before the official dashboards now.

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#33
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These screens build information from multiple sources inc. airlines, ground control, and in some cases airport management. They're typically run off-site at a data center since that provides high resiliency and some data is sourced from outside the airport anyway. If the airport has a dedicated fiber channel between their data center and airport itself and it was damaged, this could be the result. The question I'd as…

It seems so strange that they wouldn’t have a redundant link (like the various options you suggested) or at least fall back to easily available public data (flight information sites) that would at least help some.

While I agree that it's odd that there was no fallback, the whiteboards do immediately convey 'stuff is broken, you should check this board' pretty decently, as they would stand out like a sore thumb in the airport normally.

If there was a digital fallback, it would absolutely have to have something to tell commuters that the information might be stale (as someone frantically types up flight updates in a back room somewhere)

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#34
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think gates change when planes need to be re-routed.

That’s the exception and not the rule and when it changes it’s typically just around the corner and you can do show infos on the old gate.

I've found that when the gate is printed on the ticket, it is rarely correct. Even more so for connecting flights. So in the end, I still have to look at screens until I am actually at the gate.

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#35
post #20
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems so strange that they wouldn’t have a redundant link (like the various options you suggested) or at least fall back to easily available public data (flight information sites) that would at least help some.

Or even the option of inputting the data manually on a local system, so they could use the big displays rather than some whiteboards!

As someone above already mentioned — the whiteboards themselves also convey the message of “something is wrong, you may want to verify this info” very well.

The medium is the message, etc...

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#36

If only London airports could print the gates on the tickets. But I guess they would miss out on that sweet revenue from consumption.

At high-volume airports gates aren't assigned until the plane has arrived from it's inbound flight which is often Checkin generally opens 24 hours prior to departure (some airlines now allow >7 days prior) - hence for the vast majority of passengers the gate is unavailable as ticket issuance time.

Most airports and airlines let you get gate information fro their websites/apps as well though..

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These screens build information from multiple sources inc. airlines, ground control, and in some cases airport management. They're typically run off-site at a data center since that provides high resiliency and some data is sourced from outside the airport anyway. If the airport has a dedicated fiber channel between their data center and airport itself and it was damaged, this could be the result. The question I'd as…

> why they have no fallback strategies They do. It's the whiteboards. Whiteboards are cheap, resilient and robust. Exactly what one wants for a backup.

Well you also need to have people run around and update them.

Re: Whiteboards used after Gatwick flight information screens fail

#39

I struggle a little to see how there is a single point of failure here (a fibre optic cable). I’d have thought the screens were powered by a device plugged into a LAN. Would be interested if anyone knows the architecture of such screens and why there is such a single point of failure in the whole airport.

According to this they have just finished rebuilding their network...

https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252441044/Gatwick-Airpor...

Post reply on HN